Compact version |
|
Thursday, 21 November 2024 | ||
|
RFE/RL Newsline, Vol. 4, No. 146, 00-08-01Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: Newsline Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty <http://www.rferl.org>RFE/RL NEWSLINEVol. 4, No. 146, 1 August 2000 Report," Vol. 2, No. 16, 26 April 2000). LFCONTENTS[A] TRANSCAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA
[B] SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
[C] END NOTE
[A] TRANSCAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA[01] IS AZERBAIJAN SETTLING CHECHENS ALONG 'LINE OF CONTACT'?TheAzerbaijani leadership has begun settling Chechen guerrillas in abandoned former Azerbaijani-populated villages in Shaumyan Raion, which borders on the unrecognized Armenian- populated Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, "Nezavisimaya gazeta" reported on 1 August, without citing sources. The Chechens in question are officially said to be refugees, but the newspaper reasoned that refugees from the war in Chechnya would be unwilling to take up residence close to the Line of Contact, which separates Karabakh Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. The Moscow daily speculates that the Azerbaijani rationale is to co-opt the Chechen fighters to launch a new military campaign to bring Karabakh back under Azerbaijani control. LF [02] GEORGIAN PRESIDENT HINTS AT RUSSIAN OBSTRUCTION OF ABKHAZPEACE PROCESSIn his weekly radio broadcast on 31 July, Eduard Shevardnadze said he doubts that the resolution on Abkhazia adopted last week by the UN Security Council will lead to a breakthrough in resolving the conflict, Interfax reported. Shevardnadze expressed regret that the Russian delegation failed to endorse the UN-drafted document intended as a basis for a settlement; that document defines Abkhazia's envisaged future status within Georgia. The Russians reportedly claimed that they have no instructions from Moscow to approve the document. Also on 31 July, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a communique affirming Moscow's intention to continue its efforts to reconcile the Georgian and Abkhaz positions and reach a mutually acceptable solution to the conflict. LF [03] GEORGIAN FOREIGN MINISTER DENIES DELAYING VISA REGIME WITH[B] SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE[04] ALBRIGHT TO SOUND OUT MONTENEGRIN LEADER ON ELECTIONS...U.S.Secretary of State Madeleine Albright will ask Montenegrin President Milo Djukanovic in Rome on 1 August to "think carefully" about whether to participate in the 24 September federal elections, Reuters reported. An unnamed "senior State Department official" told the news agency that "even if [Yugoslav President Slobodan] Milosevic is going to try to manipulate the whole process, [the election is] a chance for people to show what they think." Speaking to reporters en route to Rome, Albright said: "We're generally concerned about what Milosevic may be up to. The fact that he rejiggered the constitution in order to be able to have a more concentrated authoritarian power in what could be a phony election process, which affects Montenegro." Several Montenegrin leaders have made it clear that the governing coalition will not take part in the vote under Milosevic's new electoral legislation (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 31 July 2000). PM [05] ...CALLS ON SERBIAN OPPOSITION TO UNITEAlbright said inRome on 1 August that "it is very important for the democratic opposition in Serbia to unite, to present a single slate, and to participate in the elections. They need to unite on a single candidate. That is a solution," Reuters reported. She did not elaborate. Observers note that Albright is not popular in Serbia and that she may refrain from making specific recommendations in public lest they have an unintended effect in Serbia. PM [06] UN: KOSOVA RESIDENTS TO VOTE IN YUGOSLAV ELECTIONSUNspokeswoman Susan Manuel told a news conference in Prishtina on 31 July that "this remains Yugoslavia and you have the right to participate in elections. We are working out a policy on Kosovo's possible participation in elections." But Oliver Ivanovic, who is a Serbian leader from northern Mitrovica, argued that "we need more security and returns [of Serbian refugees and displaced persons], but not elections," AP reported. Ivanovic was in Prishtina to discuss ways of speeding up the return of Serbs to Kosova with UN and KFOR officials. Ivanovic stressed that "this is a crucial moment. We have to coordinate all things [connected with the returns] with the United Nations Mission in Kosovo, NATO, and perhaps the Albanian community." Ivanovic has generally shunned UN- and NATO-sponsored meetings in Prishtina. PM [07] YUGOSLAV COMMANDER: MONTENEGRO 'UNDERMINING' ARMYGeneralNebojsa Pavkovic, who heads the army General Staff, said that the army is ready to return to Kosova and "settle scores with" all paramilitary and "terrorist" organizations there, "Vesti" reported on 1 August. He added that "following NATO's aggression against Yugoslavia..., the world policeman...must now contend with [unspecified] significant changes [to NATO's disadvantage] in world and regional affairs and within the international community." Pavkovic also said that the Montenegrin leadership has repeatedly "undermined the national defense system...and most energetically attacked the Yugoslav Army," RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 25 July 2000). PM [08] 'SILLY SEASON' COMES TO SERBIA...Yugoslav InformationMinister Goran Matic said in Belgrade on 31 July that "our police are capable of protecting our state" and to that end four Dutch males were recently arrested, London's "Financial Times" reported. Matic, who is known for his outspoken anti- Western remarks, claimed that the four are "members of the NATO military-intelligence community" who were sent into Serbia via Montenegro to deliver a "Serbian head" to U.S. President Bill Clinton at the recent Okinawa summit, London's "The Guardian" reported. Matic showed reporters a video of the men "confessing" that they are bounty-hunters who wanted to "put [Milosevic] in a ski box and drive him out of the country." Matic added that the British SAS "is training Montenegrin special units," Reuters reported. Observers note that the Belgrade regime periodically announces that it has "uncovered" alleged foreign-based conspiracies (see "RFE/RL Balkan Report," 8 February 2000). PM [09] ...WHILE DUTCH REMAIN BAFFLED BY SERBIAN CHARGESA Dutchembassy spokesman said in Belgrade on 31 July that the Serbian authorities have not informed the embassy about the four men, Reuters reported. In The Hague, a Foreign Ministry spokesman denied any firm knowledge of the case, "The Guardian" added. An unidentified Dutch "government source" told the London daily that the four could be tourists whom the Belgrade authorities have decided to exploit for propaganda purposes. PM [10] SLOVENIAN PRIME MINISTER SET TO LAUNCH PARTYPrime MinisterAndrej Bajuk told a press conference in Ljubljana that his New Slovenia/NSI/People's Christian Party will hold its founding meeting on 11 August, "Delo" reported on 1 August (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 27 July 2000). Foreign Minister Lojze Peterle will also be a founding member of New Slovenia. Bajuk stressed that the country needs a new moderate party that is credible and reliable, "Dnevnik" reported. Bajuk decided to found the center-right party after differences emerged recently between him and his People's Party (SLS/SKD) over a new election law. Parliamentary elections will take place on 15 October. New Slovenia, the People's Party, the conservative Social Democrats, and the small National Party are led primarily by people with family roots in the anti- communist Domobranci (Home Guards) of World War II, including Bajuk, Peterle, and Social Democratic leader Janez Jansa. The center-left parties are led primarily by people from the former communist nomenklatura. PM [11] SLOVENIAN NATIONAL BANK CHIEF TO STAY OUT OF POLITICSFranceArhar, who is governor of the National Bank, has turned down an offer from the People's Party for an unspecified top position in that party, "Delo" reported on 1 August. Arhar said that he is "grateful" for the offer but will stay with the National Bank. PM [12] CROATS BACK EU MEMBERSHIPThe Ministry of EuropeanIntegration has published the results of a poll indicating that more than 80 percent of respondents have a positive view of the EU and that 77 percent favor Croatia's joining that body, AP reported. PM [13] NATO NAMES NEW BOSNIAN COMMANDERNATO has appointed U.S.General Michael L. Dodson to replace General Ronald E. Adams in command of SFOR troops in Bosnia, AP reported from Brussels on 1 August. PM [14] BOSNIAN SERB HARD-LINE PARTY PICKS CANDIDATEThe steeringcommittee of Radovan Karadzic's Serbian Democratic Party voted in Bijeljina on 31 July to nominate Republika Srpska Vice President Mirko Sarovic for the presidency of the Bosnian Serb entity, RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported. PM [15] ROMANIA'S LIBERALS, PEASANTISTS, EXCHANGE MUTUALRECRIMINATIONS..."The National Liberal Party (PNL) has placed itself outside the ranks of the Democratic Convention of Romania (CDR)," National Peasant Party Christian Democratic (PNTCD) Chairman Ion Diaconescu told journalists after meeting with PNL negotiators on 31 July. Diaconescu said the PNTCD will "no longer bear" PNL insults directed against it. Diaconescu and the leaders of the two ecologist parties in the CDR announced they are starting negotiations with the Union of Rightist Forces (UFD) and the Christian Democratic National Alliance over enlarging the CDR. But PNL First Deputy Chairman Valeriu Stoica said it is the PNTCD that has "placed itself outside the CDR," and he warned that if a decision is taken on the CDR's future without the agreement of the PNL, that move can be contested in court. Stoica said the three parties "are free" to set up another alliance but such a grouping will have to run under another name. MS [16] ...WHILE NEW RIGHTIST ALLIANCE STILL FACES PROBLEMSOttoWeber, leader of the Ecologist Party (PER), said after the 31 July meeting that his formation refuses to merge with the Ecologist Federation, Mediafax reported. The PNTCD has been urging such a move to reduce the electoral hurdle that the alliance will have to pass to gain parliamentary representation. Weber said, however, that the PER cannot merge "with a party of former [secret police] informers." Meanwhile, UFD co-chairman Adrian Iorgulescu and Diaconescu have concluded a "protocol of cooperation" to set up a new rightist alliance, but Iorgulescu said the agreement necessitates the "restructuring" of the CDR. He said the UFD will "by no means return to the same CDR it has left," and he suggested that the new alliance change its name to either the Coalition of the Romanian Right or the Coalition of the Romanian Center-Right, both of which would allow it to keep the CDR acronym. MS [17] UKRAINE TO RESUME GAS DELIVERIES TO BULGARIAVisitingUkrainian Premier Viktor Yushchenko and his Bulgarian counterpart, Ivan Kostov, told journalists in Sofia on 28 July that Ukraine will deliver to Bulgaria 578 million cubic meters of natural gas in exchange for Bulgaria's part in laying pipelines in the 1970s, AP reported. Deliveries of natural gas started in 1998 but were interrupted earlier this year after Russia objected to Ukraine's re-exporting of those supplies. Reuters had earlier quoted Yushchenko as saying the differences with Moscow over the matter have been settled and the supplies will be resumed in August. Yushchenko also met President Petar Stoyanov, who told journalists that Ukraine and Bulgaria are "not competitors" but "partners" who "share the same Euro-Atlantic integration objectives." MS [C] END NOTE[18] STRANGE BEDFELLOWS IN LITHUANIAby Paul GobleAn unusual electoral arrangement between Lithuania's largest left-of-center party and a small one on the far right raises questions about what the former group intends to do if it wins the election later this fall and what the latter hopes to achieve. This move appears likely to raise the specter both in Lithuania and abroad that the coalition of forces operating in one Lithuanian city, which are often thought to be far apart, may now spread to the country as a whole, a development that could fundamentally change Lithuania's domestic arrangements and reorient its foreign policy goals. Arturas Paulauskas, the leader of the leftist New Union- Social Liberal Party which is widely expected to win the October parliamentary elections, announced last week that his party will not field a candidate in a district in Kaunas where that city's mayor and leader of the radical populist Freedom Union Party Vytautas Sustauskas is running. This is the second time that Paulauskas, who lost to Valdas Adamkus in the presidential race two years ago, has allied himself with Sustauskas, a man whose xenophobic views and authoritarian approach would appear to put him completely at odds with the left-of-center politics Paulauskas himself has publicly espoused. In April, Sustauskas became mayor of Kaunas when the eight city council members from Paulauskas's party voted for him. That arrangement struck many people at the time as evidence of the possible emergence of an unusual coalition in Lithuania's second-largest city which some have described as red-brown: red because of Paulauskas' ties to the old communist and security elites, and brown because of Sustauskas' nationalist populism and the anti-Semitism of some of his allies. Such fears were fueled when the Kaunas city police controlled by Sustauskas did nothing to stop a group of rowdies widely believed to have ties to the mayor from beating up student demonstrators against his rise to power there, an action that has chilled political life in the pre- war capital so thoroughly that there have been no marches or demonstrations since that time. But because Paulauskas continued to maintain his ties with a number of centrist parties in the Lithuanian parliament and because he continued to support Lithuanian efforts to reintegrate into the West through eventual membership in NATO and the EU, suspicions about the actions of his party colleagues in Kaunas have receded into the background. Now, however, such suspicions appear certain to increase, thus affecting Lithuanian politics both during the campaign and afterward. By making the deal with Sustauskas, Paulauskas has effectively broken with the centrist parties with which he had been allied. They are thus likely to be ever less certain as to what he believes and thus ever less willing to cooperate with him in the future. And at least some are likely to ask why Paulauskas would be giving respectability to someone like Sustauskas, whom they have shunned. Several centrist political figures already have pointed out the fact that Paulauskas could have helped their candidates in the same way he is helping Sustauskas. Others are now asking why the leadership of Paulauskas' party includes some who worked against Lithuania's drive to recover its independence. One of these--a failed candidate for the Vilnius city council--was even given a prison sentence for his role in the January 1991 events. Such questions could further poison the upcoming election campaign and, more serious, make the formation of a new coalition government far more difficult after the votes are counted. Indeed, it could force Paulauskas, whose party leads the polls but is not expected to gain a clear majority in the 141-seat national legislature, to seek the support of or even build a coalition with right-wing groups like those of Sustauskas. In addition to giving Sustauskas a greater opportunity to spread his views, any such arrangements could mean that his opposition to foreign investment in Lithuania, to spending the money that NATO membership will require, and to the respect for civil rights that democracy requires would affect Lithuanian policy and especially its relations with the West. That possibility is all the greater because Paulauskas himself already took the lead in organizing opposition to a major U.S. investment project in Lithuania and has raised questions about defense spending. For all these reasons, at least some in Lithuania and in the West may conclude that Lithuania may be about to follow the path of several other post-communist countries where populists of the left and the right have linked up. They may thus decide that Paulauskas and Sustauskas, as different as they appear at first glance, are not really strange political bedfellows after all. 01-08-00 Reprinted with permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
|