Contribute to the HR-Net Forum Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923) Read the Convention Relating to the Regime of the Straits (24 July 1923)
HR-Net - Hellenic Resources Network Compact version
Today's Suggestion
Read The "Macedonian Question" (by Maria Nystazopoulou-Pelekidou)
HomeAbout HR-NetNewsWeb SitesDocumentsOnline HelpUsage InformationContact us
Thursday, 28 March 2024
 
News
  Latest News (All)
     From Greece
     From Cyprus
     From Europe
     From Balkans
     From Turkey
     From USA
  Announcements
  World Press
  News Archives
Web Sites
  Hosted
  Mirrored
  Interesting Nodes
Documents
  Special Topics
  Treaties, Conventions
  Constitutions
  U.S. Agencies
  Cyprus Problem
  Other
Services
  Personal NewsPaper
  Greek Fonts
  Tools
  F.A.Q.
 

U.S. Department of State Daily Press Briefing #126, 00-12-14

U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article

From: The Department of State Foreign Affairs Network (DOSFAN) at <http://www.state.gov>


742
U.S. Department of State
Press Briefing

Thursday, December 14, 2000 Briefer: Richard Boucher, Spokesman


ANNOUNCEMENTS

1 There will be a background briefing here on Friday at 3:00 p.m. concerning the UNSC resolution on the Taliban seeking expulsion of Usama bin Laden and on our humanitarian efforts for the Afghan people

New advertising campaign for the Rewards for Justice Program

REWARDS FOR JUSTICE PROGRAM

1-2 Focus on specific acts of terrorism against American interests worldwide/ Willingness to pay up to $5 million for information/ Advertising campaign will cost about $100,000

3-4 Whether campaign names particular people we are looking for/ Availability of posters in Urdu/ Data on Rewards For Justice Program/ Inception of Rewards for Justice Program in 1984/ Purpose for launching campaign at this time

4-5 Who money is rewarded to/ Procedure for assessing the size of the reward/ Number of tips that prevented acts of terrorism/ Why Usama bin Laden has not been brought to justice

CYPRUS

6 Threat to impose further restrictions on the UN peacekeeping force in Cyprus/ Hope for achieving significant and comprehensive settlement

TRANSITION

6-8 Whether there has been contact with Bush transition people concerning this building/ Number of political appointees in the building

DEPARTMENT

7-8 Under Secretary Pickering will join the Boeing Company as senior vice president for international relations/ His role in the transition

RUSSIA

8-9 Release of Edmond Pope/ President Putin's decision to pardon Mr. Pope/ Mr. Pope is in Frankfurt to get medical attention/ Conversations with Russian leaders after the release/ Providing information to Americans that describes the perils of Doing high-technology business in Russia

MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS

9-12 Meeting with Arafat in Morocco/ Willingness to continue working on this right through the end of the Administration/ No announcement regarding further travel plans/ President Clinton and Secretary Albright are prepared to do whatever they can to help the parties restore calm and find a way back to peacemaking/ More than 300 people have been killed/ Preliminary report from Senator Mitchell and his committee

TURKEY/QATAR

12-13 Both the Adana and Istanbul consulates remain closed to the public/ October 12 Worldwide Caution remains in effect/October 18 Public Announcement for Persian Gulf, Arabian Peninsula and Turkey remains in effect/ US Embassy in Doha will reassess the situation over their weekend

PAKISTAN/SAUDI ARABIA/UK

13 Nawaz Sharif is now a free man in Saudi Arabia/ UK has announced that doors for him and his family are open

NICARAGUA

13 American woman in Nicaragua whom the authorities are after/ Order that she depart the country immediately

SAUDI ARABIA

13-15 American citizen Michael Sedlak detained in Saudi Arabia/ Another consular visit is planned for next week/ Privacy Act Waiver

CHINA

15-16 Rebuke of Chinese authorities for the jailing of Falun Gong member and for closing of numerous churches in China/Concern that Chinese authorities have launched accelerate campaign targeting Christians and Falun Gong members/Whether Chinese government is in violation of any of the UN covenants that they have signed

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DAILY PRESS BRIEFING
DPB # 126
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2000 12:50 P.M.

(ON THE RECORD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)

MR. BOUCHER: Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Let me first tell you that we will have a background briefing here from senior State Department officials on Friday at 3:00 p.m. concerning the UN Security Council resolution on the Taliban seeking the expulsion of Usama bin Laden and on our humanitarian efforts for the Afghan people. So a lot more background on those issues that are currently in the air, and we will have several senior officials down here to address those with anybody who is interested.

QUESTION: Background or on the record?

MR. BOUCHER: Background.

QUESTION: Can we protest?

MR. BOUCHER: Okay, protest. I'll check into it.

QUESTION: Yes, thank you.

MR. BOUCHER: Okay, protest recorded. I'll see if I can get them on camera.

Second, today I would like to tell you about the Rewards for Justice Program. We are starting a new advertising campaign. I think you know we have done these things in the past. These are the posters that are involved. Basically, this campaign is devoted to prevention. This is a program that has been very successful in the past. It has focused on specific acts of international terrorism against American interests worldwide. Through the years, we have advertised in posters, matchbooks, paid advertisements, public service announcements, via the Internet. The campaigns have resulted in approximately 20 international terrorists that are now in prison around the world as a result of the program. We have paid more than $6 million to people who have come forward with information that has helped us get people.

Perhaps the greatest success was in February of 1995, with the arrest of Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind of the World Trade Center bombing. Without question, this reward program is a key component of our anti-terrorism policy.

So today we are unveiling a new publicity effort. This is centered on a less well-known but, again, critical aspect of the program: prevention. Through the campaign we promote our determination to prevent acts of terrorism worldwide and our willingness to pay up to $5 million for information that helps us prevent acts of terrorism.

We have a 30-second public service announcement -- and we can give tapes to those who might want them -- that shows the plague of terrorism through visual images that is the anchor to the prevention campaign. A public service announcement has been made available to all our posts abroad, who then can pass it out to TV stations and others around these various countries.

We have made it available in English, German, French, Chinese, Mandarin, Arabic, Russian, Spanish and Urdu. It is posted also in all these languages on the Rewards for Justice Website, which is .

We will be using posters, print media, radio ads to emphasize as prevention methods. Posters will be printed in the same eight languages and distributed worldwide. We do think that thousands of lives have been saved as a result of this program, and the campaign we are launching today is intended to save thousands more.

So that is what we are launching. This is a program that has been going on for many years. There are many ways to contact us -- through the Internet, through the email, again through the Internet, a toll-free number in the United States and Canada, and by mail. And, also, people overseas can contact the security officers at our embassies and consulates. So that is available as well. We will put out a written statement and fact sheet on the subject to give you all more information.

Now, with that announcement, I would be happy to take your questions on this or any other topic.

QUESTION: If there are no questions on this, could I ask about the transition?

MR. BOUCHER: Okay, we have some questions on this.

QUESTION: How much are you spending on this advertising campaign?

MR. BOUCHER: It will cost about $100,000 for the advertising campaign.

QUESTION: And can you tell us what the largest single reward issued was? I think we had that figure once before but --

MR. BOUCHER: I don't know that we have given out that kind of figure. I think that is the kind of figure that we might want to keep in order to keep it from being too specific about the kind of information people are giving it, and who we're paying to. But I'll see if I can get you that.

QUESTION: Does the campaign name any particular people that you're looking for? Or is it just -- it's just a --

MR. BOUCHER: This part of the campaign is prevention. Obviously the posters of the people we're looking for, in terms of bringing perpetrators to justice, is well known. That information is out there on the Website and elsewhere. That names particular people. What we are launching today are a public service announcement and a campaign aimed at prevention. Tell us about something that is going to happen, and we will pay you for helping save lives.

QUESTION: You mentioned this -- I mean, this is the first time that the posters are being made in Urdu? That's because of Pakistan, because Urdu is good only for Pakistanis?

MR. BOUCHER: We hope that Pakistanis will be able to read and tell us what they know. I'm not sure this is the first time it's been done in Urdu. I would have to check on that.

QUESTION: That's because Usama bin Laden may be or have contact in Pakistan, or back and forth?

MR. BOUCHER: It is because of our deep concern and care for the people of Pakistan and our conviction that they want just as much as we do to stop terrorism.

QUESTION: Did this part of Rewards for Justice come about because you were getting lots of people that could help in prevention and you felt -- or they were seeking some kind of reward, or was it because you didn't have these people and you really thought you needed to develop that aspect of the counter-terrorism program?

MR. BOUCHER: I think I can't really say sort of one or the other. The aspect that was most heavily publicized, that was most well known, was seeking perpetrators, trying to get people -- suspects -- who we think had committed crimes and acts of terrorism. This was always an aspect of the program, but it wasn't as heavily publicized, so it's like pushing forward on the second dynamic of this program to make it more publicly available.

You know, we get some numbers. Let me give you some numbers. On the Website we get 1.2 million hits a year on this Website, . We've got 1,200 emails; 800 of them being tips on terrorism, 200 being tips on other crimes and the remainder being other information.

QUESTION: A year?

MR. BOUCHER: I think that is to date. That's per year? Okay, sorry. That's per year. Twelve percent of those tips then become leads, so out of 1,000 tips on terrorism and other crimes, we may get 120 or so leads that are then investigated.

We get 600 letters a year; 42 percent of those involve terrorism. I can't tell you how many of those become leads. We get something like 1,100 phone calls. The 800 number is only for the US and Canada, so that only produces about 2 percent of those calls that turn into leads.

Again, as I said, the focus has been very much on looking for people who committed crimes, but this has always been an aspect of the program and now it is an aspect of preventing terrorist acts that we want to bring forward more. And hopefully every time we can do that we save lives.

QUESTION: I'm sure we've gone over this before, but where does the $5 million come from?

MR. BOUCHER: Where does it come from?

QUESTION: Budgeted --

MR. BOUCHER: It comes from the American taxpayer and the American people. There is also a rewards program that is done -- the Airline Pilots Association has, and that we operate in conjunction with them. So let me double-check and make sure the 5 million is pure US Government money. But there are others that provide similar programs.

QUESTION: When did the program begin? You talked about 20 international terrorists --

MR. BOUCHER: Since the inception of the Rewards for Justice Program in 1984 --

QUESTION: So 20 since 1984?

MR. BOUCHER: Yes.

QUESTION: That's not such an impressive figure.

MR. BOUCHER: Well, 20 people in jail, 20 terrorists in jail, is thousands of lives saved. I think that there is no question that putting these guys in jail who blow up buildings is worth every penny we spend on it.

QUESTION: Any particular reason why you're launching this particular campaign now?

MR. BOUCHER: Because we don't want terrorist acts to occur. No, the timing is a result of something that has been in preparation for months. It is something we've been working on, and we're ready to do it now. There is no particular association with current events.

QUESTION: Is it the case that you'll give the money to whoever turns in a terrorist regardless of their own potentially unsavory past? You don't care who it is as long as they give you information that's worth money?

MR. BOUCHER: I am not sure that's exactly the way we phrase it, but we --

QUESTION: Is that the case, though? I think you can phrase it --

MR. BOUCHER: We go after information. What we need is information to prevent terrorist acts, yes.

QUESTION: Are there any rules attached to that information that says certain people with certain things in their own past will not qualify for the reward money?

MR. BOUCHER: I would have to check on that and see. I don't know that we've stated it that way, but I'll have to check and see.

QUESTION: Could you tell us the procedure for assessing the size of the reward, and is there any appeal against the size of it?

(Laughter.)

QUESTION: I mean, could you say, "Sorry, this isn't enough"?

MR. BOUCHER: Our people are obviously in touch with the people who give the information, who provide the information, and I'm sure that the offers are more than generous. And if anybody has anything to say about them, they know whom to call to talk about it.

So, no, I can't. The people who are in touch with them to make the offer -- I don't know that we actually negotiate the size of the awards. But obviously the more important the information, the better the information, the more significant the act that was prevented, the more we are able to give to people, and it can go quite high, up to $5 million.

Are working journalists eligible? I'll have to check on that, too. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: Richard, do you have any idea, since you said this is an element of the previous Rewards for Justice program, how many tips may have prevented acts of terrorism, significant --

MR. BOUCHER: No, I don't think I'm able to do that at this point. Again, I'll check and see. They weren't -- this is about as good as we could do on the numbers.

QUESTION: Richard, you're saying really that reward money works, or it is working, it has worked now. I believe there is $5 million on Usama bin Laden. Why has it not worked? It has been a long time. This is a lot of money for that area.

MR. BOUCHER: You know, it's there; there are quite a few people. Why it doesn't work? Because people manage to hole up in Afghanistan and not get expelled and not get brought to justice. That is a problem, and that is something we are working on with UN resolutions and with the cooperation of the rest of the international community.

We don't think that money alone can bring every terrorist to justice, and we certainly don't just rely on putting a stack of money on the table and waiting for terrorists to walk in or people with information to walk in. We have a very active program: UN sanctions, UN pressures, US law enforcement activity, cooperation with other governments against terrorism. So this is not the only way we seek to bring people to justice, but it is a useful and important element.

QUESTION: Mr. Denktash, in the north of Cyprus, or what he calls Northern Cyprus, is saying he'll put new restrictions -- he isn't spelling them out - - on UN peacekeepers. Now that their mission has been extended, does the State Department have a view of that threat?

MR. BOUCHER: What we have always said is that we believe it is very important for the UN to be there. We joined in the unanimous UN Security Council resolution yesterday that renewed the peacekeeping force for six months. The renewal resolution urges the Turkish side to rescind the restrictions that it has imposed on peacekeepers since June. It calls for restoration of the status quo ante in Strovilia, along the Green Line, and clearly we would strongly oppose any additional measures to restrict the operations by the UN forces there.

We believe very strongly in the talks. We think the two leaders need to return to Geneva to resume their talks in late January with the UN Secretary General. We understood Mr. Denktash is trying to, or may intend to, set some conditions on his further participation in the UN talks, but we believe the interests of Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots are best served by, in fact, continuing the talks. And so I want to reiterate we support the UN process and the Secretary General's attempts to achieve a significant and comprehensive settlement in Cyprus.

QUESTION: Is there hope for that? This Administration, I think more than any other, put a special mark on Cyprus. In fact, I remember Mr. Berger saying a couple, three years ago, it's one of the high priority items. It doesn't seem to be moving -- the negotiations. Can you possibly see something happening before you turn in your hats?

MR. BOUCHER: It is really very much a UN-scheduled effort. Obviously, the United States works a lot on this -- has since this beginning. When I was out there in 1993, all the way to date, the United States, this Administration, has been very, very active. But we work in support of the UN effort, and the UN Secretary General has asked them to get back together in Geneva in late January. That is the next opportunity to move towards a settlement, and we certainly hope that all the parties will show up, and all the parties will work hard there to try to resolve this issue.

QUESTION: Has there been any contact with Bush transition people concerning this building?

MR. BOUCHER: The way that this works, at least as far as we know here, is that we will be contacted by the sort of GSA-approved transition team at some point, and that at that point we would work with a transition team, the specific elements that are appointed to help with the transition of the State Department.

So we are very prepared for their arrival at any time. The Secretary has made clear to all of us that the Department is to provide the fullest possible support to the State Department transition team, but we have not yet been contacted by members of the team, nor do we know who will serve on it.

QUESTION: Has the Secretary called anyone to offer condolences or congratulations?

MR. BOUCHER: Not that I know of.

QUESTION: Not even Gore?

MR. BOUCHER: I don't know when the last time was that she talked to Vice President Gore. I'll have to check on that. But I hadn't heard of any phone calls in the last day or two. I left the party sort of just after the news had come out, and I'm afraid I did not talk to the Secretary about whether she made any --

QUESTION: Is somebody designated the point man or point person to deal with the Bush people?

MR. BOUCHER: Our Executive Secretary is where the preparations are concentrated. Kristie Kenney, the Executive Secretary for the Department, is sort of in charge of the overall process and effort, but of course there are all of us available and ready to work with them as they come in. The Secretary has made quite clear she wants this to be smooth; she wants us to be forthcoming; she wants us to work very well in the interest of the United States and the broader interests of America.

QUESTION: New subject. Is that all right?

MR. BOUCHER: New subject?

QUESTION: One quick question on that. Do you know how many political appointees there are in this building?

MR. BOUCHER: No. I'll try to find out. I think that's the way I answered it last time when I said I'd try to find out. Did I find out? We can get it.

QUESTION: You're now losing more senior people -- Mr. Pickering?

MR. BOUCHER: Yes.

QUESTION: Would you care to say anything about it? He took on a lot of quiet, heavy jobs in the last several years.

MR. BOUCHER: First of all, he is joining the Boeing Company as a senior vice president for international relations. It becomes effective in January, following his retirement from State Department and approval by the Boeing board of directors. He is one of our most senior career diplomats. He has been an eminent ambassador in many places around the world. I don't think I have the list, but he has been confirmed by the Senate, I think a dozen times, if I'm correct, maybe more.

He has certainly taken on a lot of serious jobs for the Secretary, and you have seen him down here talking about subjects all around the world. And so he is one of our leaders, both for the career Foreign Service and for this Administration. He has been a very active and important element of our diplomacy, and I'm sure he'll be missed in that regard, but we all wish him well in his new job.

QUESTION: Considering his experience, will he play any role in the transition that you're aware of?

MR. BOUCHER: I'm sure he will make himself fully available to the transition people and will obviously have a role. Again, you know, until we know who the people are and who they want to talk to, all we can say is we're here, we're ready, we're willing to help and we want to help, we want to make this work best.

We are all quite aware of this whole process from when the Administration started, when we sort of had a number of issues that were passed on to us and with advice and good wishes. This Administration has taken care of a number of things, but every time an administration changes over there are issues and policies and programs that we pass on to our successors. And we all want to do that and make sure the babies get taken care of in the future.

QUESTION: And the babies passed on to you were passed on by basically like-minded people and passed on to you sort of as chapter two of the Clinton Administration and without the time constraints --

MR. BOUCHER: Well, I go back also to 1992-93. Secretary Christopher came. That was a very smooth transition. And I think that the commitment around here, and certainly the commitment from the Secretary, is to make this a smooth a transition that works in the interest of the people of the United States.

QUESTION: Do you have anything on Pope?

MR. BOUCHER: Okay. What do you want to talk about?

QUESTION: Tell us if you know anything beyond his release, welcome his release -- whatever you want.

MR. BOUCHER: We are, first of all, I think clearly relieved for Mr. Pope, for his family. We are happy to see that the ordeal is finally over. As you all know, President Clinton and Secretary Albright, Ambassador Collins, State Department officials in Washington, State Department officials at our Embassy in Moscow, together with people like Congressman John Peterson and obviously Mr. Pope's family, have been intensively engaged in this effort over the last nine months in order to protect his welfare, first and foremost, and, second of all, to press for his release. We are very relieved that he has been released. The President issued a statement that said he appreciated President Putin's decision to pardon Mr. Pope, but once again says we believe the ordeal was not justified and we are glad the humanitarian considerations have finally prevailed.

He is making an initial -- Mr. Pope is in Frankfurt making an initial stop to get medical attention, and medical specialists will help him assess his condition before he returns home.

QUESTION: Yeah, a follow-up. There were some indications out of Moscow that President Putin wanted to wait until the transition of the US presidency to make his decision. Do you have any indication that this was based on what happened here yesterday?

MR. BOUCHER: No, no. I mean, quite to the contrary, last week when the Russians started talking about the 14th, talking about the possibility of pardon last week when the clemency board recommended a pardon, I think neither the Russians nor we knew exactly what day our election matters would be settled. So I would tend to think that that's not a very logical supposition based on the events.

QUESTION: Now that this is over, Richard, can you tell us whether there were any signals given in any of these many phone calls we've been told about over the past few weeks that this is the way it would probably work out, only they had to wait for -- I mean, did the Russians -- did Putin to the President -- did Ivanov to the Secretary -- did anyone kind of say that we had to wait for this legal matter to work its will?

MR. BOUCHER: The question is: Can I tell you? The answer is: No.

QUESTION: Were there any conversations with the President -- President Clinton or Secretary Albright with any Russian leaders after the release? And does the State Department plan to reissue its consular advisory on Russia to take out some of the precautions that American business professionals should take there?

MR. BOUCHER: Conversations since the release? I don't know. I'll have to check on that.

I think the Consular Information Sheets are intended to provide background for travelers, things that we believe American travelers need to know. After examining the situation with regard to Mr. Pope, we did put in information that described the perils of doing high-technology business in Russia. I think the experience would teach us all that maybe that information is valid and should stay, but obviously we will review these sheets on a regular basis. But for the moment it remains part of our advice to Americans, part of our information for Americans until we decide it needs to be changed, that that's not valid information.

QUESTION: What can you tell us about the meeting with Arafat in Morocco?

MR. BOUCHER: It occurred on Tuesday. Dennis Ross met in Morocco with Chairman Arafat, with Palestinian negotiators. They discussed the current situation in the region. The focus was to talk about the current situation, talk about how to stabilize the situation, talk about how to create a bridge back to peacemaking.

We wanted to make clear that our commitment to the peace process, ending the violence and resuming the negotiations, have been constant throughout this situation. And we continue to urge both sides to do whatever they can to end the violence, restore calm, and find a way back to the negotiating table.

QUESTION: Would you say that Mr. Ross and others were encouraged by what they heard from Mr. Arafat? Or did they feel that they were hearing the same old message?

MR. BOUCHER: No, I don't think we want to try to characterize this that way after every single meeting. We haven't done that in the past; we wouldn't do it now.

QUESTION: This is a very important meeting.

MR. BOUCHER: I think what this meeting shows is what the President and the Secretary have said: that we will continue to work on this. Ambassador Ross continues to work on this. We will continue to do whatever we can to stop the terrible violence in the Middle East, but also to bridge our way back to the peace process. And the fact of Ambassador Ross and his team going out there to meet with Chairman Arafat and the Palestinian officials shows that we are willing and do intend to continue working on this right through the end of the Administration.

QUESTION: Is there another trip planned, perhaps by Secretary Albright at some point in the near future?

MR. BOUCHER: At this point we don't have anything like that to announce.

QUESTION: Well, it's just these Israeli reports that Albright is going, and apparently this building has said that those are just simply Israeli reports. Is there any basis in fact for these rumors? Is there any discussion of a trip in the near future for her?

MR. BOUCHER: I think on the Middle East, there are so many rumors that we have never been in the business of saying whether any rumors had any basis. All I can tell you at this point is we don't have anything to announce regarding further travel plans.

QUESTION: Well, and then yesterday, Barak appealing to President Clinton to really jump in and do more, that it's time for a last-ditch effort. Has the President been in contact with the Secretary about ways to launch some kind of last-ditch effort, or is there anything going on?

MR. BOUCHER: I don't know if the President has spoken with the Secretary. I do know that the Secretary, throughout her trip, has been in touch with Sandy Berger. Obviously, Ambassador Ross has talked to the Secretary, reported on his meetings, and that they continue to consider together what the next steps should be.

I think what this meeting demonstrates is what we have said along, what has been true along: the President and the Secretary are prepared to do whatever they can to help the parties restore calm and find a way back to peacemaking.

QUESTION: In the last four days, I believe, the Israelis have killed four Palestinian militants, leaders, in what is being dubbed, at least by the Palestinians, as assassinations. Do we regard these kinds of activities by the Israelis as helpful to the peace process, in the light of the fall?

MR. BOUCHER: There is too much violence. We have all been quite clear on that. We have not tried to characterize particular events. There is a fact- finding committee, as you know, that goes out there and will look at -- is out there, has been there, and will help us understand the causes of the violence and how to prevent the recurrence of it.

What is clear to us is that there is a cycle of violence that perpetuates itself, that deepens the tragedy for both Palestinians and Israelis. There are more than 300 people that have been killed in the violence. The vast majority of those people have been Palestinian. We are deeply saddened by these losses of life. The violence has destroyed lives, it has devastated families, ruined economic opportunities, and worsened the level of mistrust between the two communities.

But, in the end, these two communities have to live side by side, and it is best -- the only way is to achieve an end to the violence. We have made quite clear -- the Secretary has made quite clear -- that the cycle needs to be broken. She has laid out what she thinks the Israelis need to do, laid out what she thinks the Palestinian Authority needs to do, in quite specific terms for you, about two weeks ago, right here. Those steps need to be taken, must be taken, and we need to really get an end to the cycle.

QUESTION: Can we expect, then, that Dennis Ross will remain in his post until January 20th?

MR. BOUCHER: I don't think he has indicated anything to the contrary. I haven't actually asked him that specific question, but I think when he talked about it originally he talked about leaving his job -- originally he talked about it in terms of after January 20th.

QUESTION: Has there been any kind of preliminary report from Senator George Mitchell and his committee after his initial meetings with the parties? And what is going to be the regular -- is he going to give one massive report at the end when he is done with his investigation, or is he going to give small little update reports?

MR. BOUCHER: Good questions. Would you like his phone number? As we have said before, it is an independent body. They will proceed in their work according to how they best decide to proceed, and how they decide to report. I think in Sharm el Sheikh and elsewhere, we have only talked about the final report that we would expect, but for more information on their travel and scope of work, you should contact his office at 202-371- 6012.

QUESTION: Could you repeat that phone number?

MR. BOUCHER: 202-371-6012.

QUESTION: So are you saying that Senator Mitchell will not be contacting Secretary Albright during his stay there?

MR. BOUCHER: No, I didn't say that. I said that they are independent. They will decide how they want to conduct their work. They will decide what sort of interim reporting they want to provide. They will decide how best to proceed. And it is really up to them to talk about it, to decide. I'm sure if Senator Mitchell decides to contact Secretary Albright as part of this process that she would love to talk to him.

QUESTION: New subject. In the last few days, we have become aware of several embassy and consular closings. Can you bring us up to date on Qatar, the two consulates in Turkey, and any others, just to throw a blanket over the whole thing? How many others are closed up?

MR. BOUCHER: Travel Warnings are out there. You have seen them out there, and we issue them. You can go through the files. On closures, let me deal with the situations in Turkey first, tell you what is going on there, and then Doha. I'm not aware of any others. Chuck, are you aware of any? No, I think those are the only two that we're aware of here.

Both the Adana and Istanbul Consulates remain closed to the public. That means they are not open for public services. Obviously, our people continue to go to work and do their jobs. We are still evaluating the security information that we got in those circumstances, and they will reopen to the public as soon as the ongoing evaluation indicates it is acceptable to open again.

We think that there is sufficient justification to take these measures that protect Turkish and American employees and our property. You will remember we did a Worldwide Caution on October 12th that remains in effect, and that related to possible security problems and need to close posts in a number of areas. We work closely with the Turkish authorities. We do want to express our appreciation to the Turkish authorities for all the help they have given us on these security issues in the past and the help they are giving us now.

I want to make clear that at this time we don't think that there is an increased level of threat to private American citizens residing or visiting in Turkey. This threat, the information that we have, has to do with our employees and our property, our diplomatic employees, our official employees, our official properties.

So there is no information that there is an increased threat level for private US citizens that are residing or visiting Turkey, except to the extent that they may want to come into our Embassies, which is why we have closed ourselves to public activity. The October 18th Public Announcement for the Persian Gulf, Arabian Peninsula, and Turkey urging Americans to use caution and remain vigilant, however, does remain in effect.

As far as the situation in Doha, the US Embassy in Doha closed to the public on Wednesday, December 6th to review its security posture. The Embassy reassessed its situation on Monday and has decided to extend the closure through December 13th. The Embassy is now closed today and tomorrow for its normal weekend schedule, Thursday, Friday in Qatar. The Embassy will reassess the situation over their weekend and make a decision regarding opening or closure for the coming week. So at this point nothing definitive out of there.

QUESTION: One more. Nawaz Sharif is now a free man in Saudi Arabia with his family, and the UK has announced that doors for him and his family are open. Are the doors here in the US open for him, and also if this Department played a role for his freedom?

MR. BOUCHER: I'll be glad to get you something on the latter question. But let me just check on those things for you. I don't have anything with me today. Have we had anything on that, Chuck, on doors being opened? I don't think we've had anything on the doors. We may have a little bit to tell you about what we knew about the other proceedings.

QUESTION: Do you have anything on an American woman in Nicaragua whom the authorities are after? She runs a clinic.

MR. BOUCHER: Yes, we are aware of the situation. We are in daily contact with this American citizen, but we actually don't know her location. We don't have a Privacy Act waiver, so all we can say is we are aware of the situation, we are in contact with her. I think she contacts us when she is able to.

We have been working and talking to the Nicaraguan officials about resolving this in an appropriate manner. We emphasize that we expect her to be fairly treated, safely treated, and that she needs to receive due process under Nicaraguan law.

QUESTION: Richard, what is the situation as you understand it?

MR. BOUCHER: To describe it in any detail would require me to get a Privacy Act waiver, and since I don't have one, I can't do that. But I think you have seen some press reports about this.

QUESTION: You don't even know what they're charging against her?

MR. BOUCHER: They have -- the Nicaraguan Government has apparently ordered that she be -- that she depart the country immediately.

QUESTION: What about an American detained in Saudi Arabia? Michael Sedlak? Do we have anything more on him?

MR. BOUCHER: In Saudi Arabia, yes, I do know something about that. What do we know? Michael Anthony Sedlak, an American citizen working for a private company in Saudi Arabia, was arrested in Riyadh on November 28th. A Consular Officer visited him on December 9th. He is well. Another consular visit is planned for next week. He has not been charged, nor has the Embassy been informed of any charges against him.

Saudi authorities have informed us they are continuing to investigate a case against Mr. Sedlak, but I repeat, he has not been charged nor have we been informed of any charges against him. In his case, we visited him and we do have a Privacy Act waiver, so that is about all we know.

QUESTION: So tell us more.

MR. BOUCHER: I think that's about all we know that we can tell you.

QUESTION: Do we know how long they can hold him under their laws without charges?

MR. BOUCHER: I don't know. I would have to check on that.

QUESTION: Forever.

QUESTION: Forever?

QUESTION: In China, I think a senior US diplomat -- do you want to follow up?

QUESTION: Can I ask about one more on Sedlak? This is the first waiver I've ever seen, by the way. (Laughter.)

MR. BOUCHER: Just about. We had a pretty extensive waiver on Mr. Colombini, but I'm not sure I can -- and Mr. Pope. So we did pretty well. It's up to individuals. But you're right, normally we don't have them. We don't -- it's law, you know. We don't talk about people unless they allow us to.

QUESTION: Do you have an age and a hometown?

MR. BOUCHER: Probably not. No, I'm afraid I don't have that, but I'll see if I can get it for you.

QUESTION: Has he expressed to you why he thinks they are taking him in, Richard -- or to Consular officials, I should say?

MR. BOUCHER: Again, we just don't have the information on possible charges that I can give you.

QUESTION: Do you know who he worked for in Saudi Arabia?

MR. BOUCHER: He worked for something called Vinell Corporation, V-i-n-e-l- l.

QUESTION: Is that "V"?

MR. BOUCHER: "V" as in Victor, i-n-e-l-l Corporation.

QUESTION: Do you know what they do?

MR. BOUCHER: No. That I'm sure you can find out.

QUESTION: On China, earlier this week a senior US diplomat called US reporters into the Embassy for a private briefing and issued a rather strong sort of rebuke of Chinese authorities for the jailing of this Falun Gong member, and also for the closing of numerous churches throughout China. How concerned is the United States that the Chinese authorities have launched some sort of accelerated campaign targeting Christians and Falun Gong members?

MR. BOUCHER: I guess I would say I'm not sure we're in a position to talk about accelerated campaigns or to draw the sort of conclusions of that type at this point. But we do know of the campaign on Falun Gong members, that that continues. We have commented, for example, about the sentencing of US legal permanent resident Teng Chunyan. We have seen a reported denial of Rebiya Kadeer's appeal for release, so we have continued to press those cases with the Chinese.

In addition, we also have independent confirmation of the destruction of a church, at least one church, in Wenzhou. We are appalled by this, particularly coming in light -- coming at the eve of the celebration of Christmas around the world. It seems particularly cruel, frankly. We have protested that here and in Beijing. We have urged China to cease the demolitions, to respect fundamental internationally recognized human rights, to exercise free exercise of religion, belief, and conscience.

So these are issues that we are concerned about, that we do continue to push, and we will continue to push, both on the side of the Falun Gong cases, Rebiya Kadeer's situation, as well as the destruction of churches.

QUESTION: On the destruction of churches, did the Chinese authorities offer any kind of explanation as to why they felt that was necessary?

MR. BOUCHER: I think it is really up to the Chinese to provide any sort of information on why they think it is necessary. We do consider these to be violations of generally expected and accepted international norms, and we will continue to push that. Frankly, we have also talked to the Chinese about -- in the past, you will remember from the President's meeting with President Jiang in Brunei, they agreed in principle to resume the human rights dialogue. We continue to think that that will be an important mechanism for discussing these issues and raising these issues.

QUESTION: Do you think the Chinese Government is in violation of any of the UN covenants that they have signed?

MR. BOUCHER: I think what is clear is that the rights to belief, expression, and association are enshrined in those international covenants, and China has adhered to these covenants, and therefore we think they should respect them.

QUESTION: Thank you.

MR. BOUCHER: Thank you.

(The briefing was concluded at 1:30 P.M.)


U.S. State Department: Daily Press Briefings Directory - Previous Article - Next Article
Back to Top
Copyright © 1995-2023 HR-Net (Hellenic Resources Network). An HRI Project.
All Rights Reserved.

HTML by the HR-Net Group / Hellenic Resources Institute, Inc.
std2html v1.01b run on Friday, 15 December 2000 - 9:22:13 UTC