Compact version |
|
Sunday, 22 December 2024 | ||
|
Cyprus PIO: Turkish Press and Other Media, 09-10-13Cyprus Press and Information Office: Turkish Cypriot Press Review Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: The Republic of Cyprus Press and Information Office Server at <http://www.pio.gov.cy/>TURKISH PRESS AND OTHER MEDIA No. 193/09 13.10.09[A] NEWS ITEMS
[B] COMMENTARIES, EDITORIALS AND ANALYSIS
[A] NEWS ITEMS[01] Talat claimed that President Christofias does not want a solution for the Cyprus problemUnder the title Christofias does not want a solution, Turkish Cypriot daily Kibris newspaper (13.10.09) reports that the Turkish Cypriot leader, Mr Mehmet Ali Talat, stated that the Turkish Cypriot side participates in the negotiation process not because it wants to gain advantage but because it wants a solution. Mr Talat made these statements during a speech he delivered at the ceremony for the beginning of the academic year of the illegal Girne (Keryneia) American University (GAU) yesterday.Mr Talat, who referred to the Cyprus problem during his speech stated: We will continue to do everything possible for the solution of this problem. However, it must be known that the negotiations have a time limit. The people cannot be held inside an endless negotiation and it cannot be condemned in an unbalanced and uncertain environment, by saying either today or tomorrow (as regards the time of the solution). Commenting on the statements made by the President of the Republic, Mr Demetris Christofias, that we are not close to the solution, we are far off, Mr Talat used the proverb Whatever the thoughts of the dervish, so are his formulas, (Tr. Note: meaning that a man's thoughts are revealed in his speech) and said that Christofias is expressing with various ways that, at least for the time being, he does not want a solution. Mr Talat went on and stated that the Mr Christofias in his speeches is trying with every occasion to create the impression that the sole reason of the non-solution of the Cyprus problem is Turkey and added that the Greek Cypriot side has exerted efforts until today in order to prevent Turkeys EU process. He also said that the Cyprus problem is an obstacle in front of Turkeys EU bit and added that from Turkeys point of view the problem is difficult to be solved because it is a national cause. Mr Talat said that it is not easy to have the responsibility for the solution of such a problem but added that they have decided to shoulder this problem and they did. Turkish Cypriot daily Ortam newspaper (13.10.09) refers to Talats statements under the title The new claims of Talat: Christofias does not want a solution and writes that the Turkish Cypriot leader, who has been saying on every opportunity that he is expecting a solution by the end of 2009, came up with a new claim now and stated that for the time being Christofias does not want a solution. (CS) [02] Eroglu accuses the Greek Cypriot side of not showing consideration and determination for the solutionTurkish Cypriot daily Kibris newspaper (13.10.09) reports that the self-styled prime minister of the occupation regime, Dervis Eroglu, stated that the Greek Cypriot side must show the same consideration and determination for the solution of the Cyprus problem, as the Turkish side. Mr Eroglu was speaking during the reception for the celebration of the 34th anniversary of the establishment of the National Unity Party in the occupied areas of Cyprus.Mr Eroglu stated that because this determination was not shown until now by the Greek Cypriot side, the reaching of an agreement is far off. He went on and added that he is not the only one who is saying this, but this is said both in the north and the south of Cyprus. In addition, Illegal Bayrak television (12.10.09) broadcast the
following: In a message marking the UBPs anniversary, Prime Minister
Dervi Erolu said: Our people s devotion to our statehood,
sovereignty and democracy is providing the basis for our success. Our
people is the source of our strength and because of this, our success
belongs to our people .
He said: The UBP is an important value created by the Cyprus Turkish
People and is the guarantee of the prosperity of the TRNC and a
cornerstone of democracy . Mr Erolu stated that the UBP s biggest
objective was to make it possible for the Turks of Cyprus to live in
peace and prosperity by protecting its identity and values on the
island.
He said that his party was determined to protect the state, which was
established by the Cyprus Turkish People who used their right to
self-determination, and to maintain the rule of law state, the unity of
the people and the country.
(CS)
Meanwhile, the students and the teachers of the 19 May TMK school in
the occupied areas held a protest act outside the self-styled ministry
of education yesterday, because they do not have teachers for six
subjects and therefore they are experiencing various problems.
In statements in front of the ministry, the chairman of KTOS, Guven
Varoglu criticized the fact that the police closed the roads towards
the assembly and added: They are trying to prevent our voice from being
heard, but they should know that we shall make our voice heard wherever
we are.
The general secretary of KTOS, Sener Elcil stated that the UBP
self-styled government, which does not know the number of the
population living in the occupied areas of Cyprus and is not exerting
efforts to prevent the flow of population from Turkey, is contributing
to the continuation of the problems in the fields of education, health
and the society, at large.
Afrika covers the issue under the front-page title This is what the
governor ordered and reports that the police increased the security
measures for the embassy of Turkey and not for the assembly. The paper
wonders since when and by whom the protests in front of the assembly
have been forbidden and writes that KTOS which organized an activity
yesterday in Lekosia bumped into the wall of the police in front of the
assembly and the embassy.
The paper reports that Mr Elcil said that the measures of the police
were taken for the embassy of Turkey and not for the assembly.
Addressing the police Mr Elcil asked whether there is a written
decision for banning such protest activities. He noted that this ban
came from the embassy and wondered: Is this what the governor asked?
(ITs)
Mr Izcan expressed the view that while Turkey fulfills its obligations
deriving from the Customs Union, it is necessary for its stance to be
constructive and helpful to the two leaders in the direction of the
solution in Cyprus.
(ITs)
Coygun took his reputable position in the history of the Turks of
Cyprus with his contributions to the Cyprus Turkish struggle for
existence.
A commemoration ceremony was held at the Kirikkale Veterans House for
Kenan Coygun, who was also known as `Kenan Pasa or Bozkurt` who served
in Cyprus as the Head of the TMT between 1962 and 1967, upon his
appointment by the Turkish Armed Forces.
In a speech at the ceremony, Vice-President of the TMT Society Celal
Bayar said Coyguns appointment was a turning point in the Cyprus
Turkish history.
Also speaking, President of the Cyprus Turkish Fighters Association
Vural Turkmen said that Kenan Coygun devoted himself to the Turkish
nation and that he had important contribution to the freedom struggle
waged by the Turks of Cyprus.
The final speech was delivered by the TMT Societys President Yilmaz
Bora who said that Kenan Coygun was the strongest guarantee of the
people and the TMT members during the existence struggle waged by the
Cyprus Turkish People.
Stressing that the bitter experiences of the past were not forgotten,
he said they expected the European Union to honor the promises it made
to the Cyprus Turks soon after the 2004 referendum.
According to the opinion poll, 67% of the persons asked find the
performance of the self-styled government positive.
In addition, prime minister Dervis Eroglu is the most popular member of
the council of ministers with 72.1%, following the minister of
education, youth and sports, Kemal Durust with 70.2%. The least
favorite is the minister of interior Ilkay Kamil with 40.3%.
The 79.20% of the persons who participated in the survey neither
support nor like the politics that the government follows as regards
the private sector.
The results of the poll on the Cyprus problem, announced by the paper
to be published today, were not reported in todays edition in Havadis.
(CS)
(EA)
The majority of ARTs broadcasts were transmitted from Ankara and the
news was spreading to the world though satellite, the paper writes and
adds that the owner of the ART is the chairman of the Turkish Metal
Workers Union (Metal-Sen), Mustafa Ozbek, one of the key figures in the
Ergenekon case.
ART is also known for its harsh stance against the government of Recep
Tayyip Erdogan and it ended its broadcast from Ankara due to financial
difficulties, the paper notes. Sources on the other hand, stress on the
fact that no change will be made on ARTs policy and that it will
continue its opposition against the Justice and Development Party
(AKP).
On the same issue and under the title "ART is also closing down",
Turkish daily Vatan newspaper (12.10.2009) reports that the
neo-nationalist TV channel ART is ending its broadcast life. ART
channel, which after KanalBis drew the attention of the public with its
radical nationalist broadcasts, is ending its broadcasting life.
According to information obtained from Turkish Metal Union, which is
the owner of ART, the channel will close down its switchbox at
approximately 1800.
(ML)
A protest is raging after banners proclaiming 'Cyprus is Greek' were
displayed during a globally-televised football match.
Pro-TRNC lobby group Embargoed! Is urging people to contact Fifa, world
football's governing body, and Uefa, which regulates the sport in
Europe, to complain about the banners that carried the slogan in six
languages during the Apoel-Chelsea Champions League match is South
Nicosia on Wednesday, September 30.
Fevzi Hussein, chairman of Embargoed!, which has around 2,500 members
worldwide, said: 'We are leading a co-ordinated effort to lobby Fifa
and Uefa over racist events at the match.
'I can confirm that non-governmental organisations in the UK and the
TRNC are uniting as one voice on this issue and we would like to
encourage our people to also individually register their protests'.
'Talks between the two sides in Cyprus are at a critical stage and this
type of behaviour is not only racist, it is also counter-productive to
reaching a settlement', added Mr Hussein, who lives in Maldon, Surrey.
'We are in the process of engaging with our members and supporters to
launch a vigorous protest campaign to stop this type of activity ever
occurring again'.
It is not the first time the Champions League has been used as a
platform to make a political point about Cyprus.
Last year's group stage match between Anorthosis FC and Werder Bremen
was used by fans to call for Mara, [Varosha] the 'ghost' suburb of
Gazi Magusa, [occupied Famagusta] to be returned to its Greek Cypriot
former inhabitants.
The club produced 2,000 posters stating 'Maras's lost home' and a
50-metre-long banner bearing the word 'Famagusta'.
After last week's incident, Ozankoy homeowner Lord Maginnis of
Drumglass, who sits in the UK House of Lords, has waded into the
argument.
He has tabled a written question in the House of Lords asking the UK
government for its response to the Greek Cypriot approach to the
current peace talks and to the display of 'Cyprus is Greek' banners at
the Apoel match.
Lord Maginnis said 'The Greek Cypriot Akritas and Iphestos 1974 plans
were based on the ethnic cleansing of Turkish Cypriots. The world
needs to be reminded that the Turkish army came to Cyprus in 1974 to
prevent that and the institutional oppression by Greek Cypriots'.
A spokesman for Uefa in Switzerland told Cyprus Today yesterday: 'We
had delegates attending this game and they have lodged two disciplinary
reports against the Cyprus Football Federation but neither related to
the display of banners. If we see photographic evidence we will
investigate the issue'.
The pictures have now been sent to Uefa, but Embargoed! Chairman Fevzi
Hussein said: 'I'm staggered that Uefa delegates failed to notice
five-foot-high letters spelling out a racist and political message on
banners'.
The website http://www.embargoed.org contains a draft letter to Fifa
and Uefa, to which anyone can add their contact details and send to the
two governing bodies via info@uefa.com and at
http://www.fifa.com/contact/form.html.
The ministry told a statement on Monday, The Anatolian Eagle is one of
the concerted drills of the Turkish Air Forces which has been held
regularly since 2001 with the international participation.
The first two stages of this year's exercises were conducted
successfully. But international part of the third stage which was
earlier scheduled to be carried out on October 12 and 23 was cancelled
in consultation with the other participating countries. But, the
exercise is continuing as a national event. Therefore, it is not
correct to impose political meanings to Turkey's decision to cancel
international part of the multi-national Anatolian Eagle air defense
exercise, it said.
To this end, it is also impossible to accept assessments and comments
published in media organs in reference to Israeli authorities. We call
on Israeli officials to act with common-sense in their statements and
attitudes, the ministry added.
Puig is in Ankara as the Turkish capital won the "2009 European Prize",
a distinction that is bestowed each year on a European town for its
actions in the European domain.
At the meeting with Bagis, Puig said he was in favor of Turkey's
integration to EU and added that majority of parliamentarians in PACE
were thinking the same way. He said it was an indisputable fact that
Turkey was a European country.
On his part, Bagis said that Turkey was a member of the Council since
the beginning, stating that the future of Europe, just as the history
of the continent, could not be explained without Turkey.
Bagis described Turkey's EU bid as a peace project and said the project
could not be completed without Turkey's accession to EU.
Reiterating Turkey's commitment to become a part of the Union, Bagis
said Turkey was determined to overcome challenges on this path.
Following his meeting with Bagis, Puig paid a visit to Turkish
Parliament and met Parliament Speaker Mehmet Ali Sahin. Their meeting
was closed to press.
Meanwhile, before his meeting with Puig, Bagis had another meeting with
Senator Rosanna Boldi, chairman of the European policy commission in
Italian Senat.
Erdogan will meet Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, Iraqi vice presidents
and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. The Turkish prime minister will hold
a press conference after his talks in Iraq.
a) The Kurdish problem
In her column entitled "PKK will lay down arms in six months" in Taraf,
Nese Duzel recounts her interview with Cevat Ones, former National
Intelligence Organization, MIT, undersecretary. Cevat Ones says in the
interview that "MIT conducts the meetings with PKK," that "PKK will be
made to lay down arms in six months," and that "the interior minister
will go to Syria, prime minister to Iraq, and the laying down of arms
of the PKK will crystallize after these meetings."
b) Turkey and Armenia Protocol
An editorial in Hurriyet Daily News.com congratulates all the countries
involved in the signing of the "historic accord" between Turkey and
Armenia for the establishment of diplomatic relations, and continues by
reminding that "yet these protocols are to be ratified at Parliament.
This time, the responsibility to change the course of history lies on
the shoulders of the lawmakers of the two countries. We sincerely hope
that the lawmakers will vote in favor of a new peaceful beginning
between the two countries, in order to not miss this historic
opportunity not only for Turks and Armenians but also for all Caucasus'
people." We, as the Daily News, congratulate those who contributed to
the realization of the signing of the historic protocols between Turkey
and Armenia, meaning a new beginning for the people of the neighboring
countries following decades of animosity.
In her commentary entitled "Understanding Azerbaijan" in Hurriyet,
Ferai Tinc writes about her e-mail exchange with Azeri political
columnist Vusal Tagibeyli, who said in his communication that " the
Turkish government may be informing the [Azeri] government on the
protocols, but the people do not have any information whatsoever.
President Gul, Prime Minister Erdogan, and Foreign Minister Davutoglu
are saying all the time that they will make any decision to upset Baku,
and we also expect the same from our brothers. From time to time,
however, the problems between Ankara and Yerevan are worrying. It could
be that they are informing the government, but they should also inform
the people." Tinc, in turn, concludes: "Despite all the concerns,
however, if the two protocols signed between Turkey and Armenia can be
facilitated by obtaining approval of the [Turkish and Armenian]
parliaments, a new era will be opened for the Caucasus. Even Azerbaijan
shares this hope. It is important to realize, not diminish this hope."
Writing from Washington for Sabah, Omer Taspinar says that "the
last-minute crisis in Zurich shows how difficult this peace process
will be for Armenia. Turkey is approaching this process with more
confidence than Armenia. Armenia, on the other hand, seems to be
writhing with pain as though it is under torture during each phase of
the process" in his commentary entitled "Why did Yerevan not leave the
table?" Taspinar continues by explaining to the "Turkish public" the
reasons for "Sarkisyan's difficulties." "Before that," however, he
notes that Turkey had two main factors for the "peace process" with
Armenia: One of them is the "zero problems" politics, and the second
and more important factor is the "foreign dynamics" such as Obama's
presidency. As to Sarkisyan, Taspinar gives two answers to the
question: "Why did Yerevan opt for embarking on the peace process just
when Obama came to power?" "One of them is because Sarkisyan is from
Nagorno-Karabakh," writes Taspinar and continues: "The second reason is
distrust of Russia. Armenia felt real concern from what Putin did in
Georgia in 2008."
Writing in Hurriyet Daily News.com, Yusuf Kanli welcomes the signing of
the protocols, but notes that "the Turkish government will not submit
the protocols to parliamentary approval" and "they will not enter into
force" unless "Armenia takes some concrete moves towards bringing an
end to the occupation of the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave and the regions
around it" in his commentary entitled "A new era in Armenia ties."
Tufan Turenc, in turn, asks in his commentary entitled "Charles
Aznavour at the Zurich evening" in Hurriyet the following questions:
"How will the initiatives stipulated in the protocols be realized?,"
"What is the 'reasonable timeframe' for Turkey to open up its borders
with Armenia?," and "When will Armenia withdraw from the territories it
has occupied so that it contributes to a solution to the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue?"
Writing in Milliyet, Semih Idiz refers to the "birth pangs" during the
signing ceremony, which was resolved by canceling the two speeches
planned to be delivered by the Turkish and Armenian foreign ministers
after the signing of the protocols in his commentary. Explaining that
Nalbandian's "behavior has strengthened the hardliners in both
countries," Idiz notes that the "concern is that the crisis in Zurich
might negatively affect the process of approval of the protocols in the
parliaments of the two countries. For this reason, it would be sensible
to wait for the atmosphere to settle down and submit the protocols to
the parliaments after a certain time. During this period, there may
also be positive developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh talks. Even if
Azerbaijan President Aliyev upholds the opposite, it is obvious that
the Turkish-Armenian process has the attributes to speed up a solution
to the Nagorno-Karabakh problem."
In his commentary entitled "This is the day of reason and peace" in
Hurriyet, Fatih Cekirge posts the speech Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu was planning to say at the end of the signing ceremony in
Zurich if there would have been no crisis on the disagreement in the
verbal statements both sides were supposed to make after the
signatures. Explaining that Davutoglu's speech was ready and that he
finished it at approximately 0530 in the morning, Cekirge posts
Davutoglu's statement, in which he writes: "We as Turkey and Armenia,
are here today to take a first step towards a new horizon. This is a
long road. It is a road filled with difficulties. This road, however,
is one worth taking. This journey can be taken with our partners here
and the people of all the Caucasus together only." Noting that only
those who have vision and courage can take such steps under difficult
circumstances, Davutoglu adds that there is a difference of opinion
about a bitter part of the joint history of our peoples and that this
difference of perception should not echo in our next generations as the
feelings of prejudice and revenge.
Under the headline, "Here is that speech," Yeni Safak carries an
"exclusive" front-page report which provides highlights from "the
speech that Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu did not deliver in Zurich,
where he signed the historic protocol between Turkey and Armenia." The
report quotes the following statements from "the speech that the
Armenians did not want to hear:" "The documents signed here create a
very important basis providing the Turkish and Armenian peoples with
the understanding they need to be able to ensure that their future
generations coexist and cooperate to create a common and prosperous
future. ... The difference of perception between the Turkish and
Armenian peoples regarding a very painful period in their common
history should not cause our future generations to be dominated by
prejudice and vengefulness."
In an article entitled "Zero problems", Vakit columnist Cuneyt Arvasi
asserts that the policy of "zero problems with neighbours" started by
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu is set to entail radical changes
unprecedented in the history of the Turkish Republic. He claims that
the agreements signed between Turkey and Armenia signify an effort to
use economic considerations as a means of solving long-standing
historical and political problems between the two countries based on
the understanding that these countries need to settle their differences
to be able to emerge as energy and trade hubs.
In an article entitled "Peace is better", Vakit columnist Abdurrahman
Dilipak argues that the latest protocols signed between Turkey and
Armenia amount to a major achievement regardless of how the process
started by these agreements will unfold. He claims that the signing of
these protocols is likely to displease the Turkish Ergenekon and the
Armenian Asala organizations most, adding that an irreversible process
has nevertheless begun where supporters of peace on both sides will
find their hands strengthened.
Under the headline, "Let us focus on friendship not enmity," Zaman
carries a front-page report which asserts that the signing of the
"historic" protocols between Turkey and Armenia in Zurich has been
greeted favourably by the entire world.
In an article entitled "The lessons to be drawn from the Armenian
overture", Zaman columnist Mehmet Yilmaz argues that Turkey's signing
of an agreement with Armenia that entails the normalization of
bilateral relations with this country means that it has discovered
quite early on its need to align itself with a new global trend whereby
ethnic and nationalist conflicts fuelled by Cold War ideologies and
theories like the "Clash of Civilizations" are giving way to dialogue
and tolerance.
Under the headline, "Turkey's proposal clears last-minute snag in
Zurich," Today's Zaman carries a front-page report which asserts that
"the chess match between Turkey and Armenia [in Zurich] came to a head
when Turkish Foreign Minister Davutoglu said 'check,' noting that he
would 'explicitly' refer in his speech to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
if the Armenian side insisted on referring to 'negotiations without
preconditions' in its text."
In an article entitled "Against the radical nationalists in Turkey and
Armenia", Today's Zaman columnist Ihsan Dagi hails Turkey and Armenia's
signing of protocols "envisaging the establishment of diplomatic
contacts and the development of bilateral relations" as "a victory
against narrow-minded nationalism both in Turkey and Armenia."
In an article entitled "Turkish-Armenian traumas", Today's Zaman
columnist Omer Taspinar discusses "what drives the rapprochement
between Armenia and Turkey" and "what fuels the reconciliation process
despite [their] mutual traumas."
Under the banner headline, "Shame on you," Milli Gazete carries a
front-page report which highlights a statement by Felicity Party, SP,
leader Numan Kurtulmus saying that the Turkish-Armenian protocols
signed in Zurich are a "historic mistake" rather than a historic step
toward a rapprochement between the two countries and that "it is highly
significant that the protocols were signed in Switzerland, which
recognizes the so-called Armenian claims of genocide and is the only
European country that hands out prison sentences to those who say that
what is called the Armenian genocide did not take place."
/EI
|