Compact version |
|
Thursday, 21 November 2024 | ||
|
Cyprus PIO: Turkish Press and Other Media, 09-06-25Cyprus Press and Information Office: Turkish Cypriot Press Review Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: The Republic of Cyprus Press and Information Office Server at <http://www.pio.gov.cy/>TURKISH PRESS AND OTHER MEDIA No. 117/09 25.06.09[A] NEWS ITEMS
[B] COMMENTARIES, EDITORIALS AND ANALYSIS
[A] NEWS ITEMS[01] Mehmet Ali Talat: What we shall agree on, we shall hand it over to constitution writers or to whoever will do this work, a Turk, a Greek Cypriot, perhaps a constitution expert from Turkey, or perhaps from other placesUnder the front page title Christofias does not have the power and courage to sign, Turkish Cypriot daily Halkin Sesi newspaper (25.06.09) reports on statements made by the Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat on the course of the Cyprus negotiation process during a visit he paid to Halkin Sesi offices yesterday.According to the paper, Mr. Talat said he maintains hopes for a referendum to be held on both sides before April 2010 and that this is among the Turkish Cypriot sides expectations. Replying to a question on who has the courage and the power to sign the agreement to be reached as a result of the two leaders meetings, and who does not, Mr. Talat said that he has concerns on this issue and underlined his belief that the Turkish Cypriots will support with a strong yes the referendum in case this is set in 2010. Reminding that the day before yesterday he briefed the so called assembly on the course of the Cyprus negotiation process, Mr. Talat said that the briefing took place after the comments made by some deputies that there is secrecy and black out on the course of the negotiations, while he gave emphasis on the fact that he conveys to the assembly all the notes he holds during his meetings with President Demetris Christofias. Referring to the advantage from the face to face negotiations, Mr. Talat said: The Presidents advantage is that he has the possibility to discuss other issues as well which he would not be able to discuss with our teams and the UN in particular. For instance, I had warned him [President Christofias]: Look, if you hold such a stance on this issue, then you cannot make a step back in the eyes of the public. If I say in front of the public that there will be a solution with an agreement reached between the TRNC and the Greek Cypriot state and when I sit on the table the Greek Cypriot side rejects this right away and insists that there will never be a solution in this framework, and I am forced to make a step back, what shall I do? The Greek Cypriots do this. On this issue I have the opportunity to make a warning. And he, of course, adjusts himself accordingly. Replying to a question whether an agreement is being prepared by international circles and whether there will be a referendum or not, Mr. Talat said: What we shall agree on, we shall hand it over to constitution writers or to whoever will do this work, a Turk, a Greek Cypriot, perhaps a constitution expert from Turkey, or perhaps from other places. We have universities now. As a result, we shall prepare the foundations. In the past the sides talked, the UN were writing and were saying these are the middle points of your negotiations, we are proposing these to you. Now it seems that it will not be this way. We have around 30 common texts. The Greek Cypriot proposals in these texts are written in blue, the Turkish Cypriot proposals in red and the common views, which constitute the majority, are in black. For the time being we are working on eliminating the blue and the red texts. The Turkish Cypriot leader made also a reference to the importance he attaches to the visit paid to him by the Vice President of the EU Commission, Gunter Verheugen, a meeting which took place regardless of the pressures posed by the Greek Cypriot side. On the property issue, Mr. Talat said that the issue will be determined based on new legislation that will be created. (ML/KV) [02] Hasan Ercakika stated that a possible settlement must pass as valid in accordance with the EU primary lawIllegal Bayrak Television (24.06.09) broadcast the following:The Presidential Spokesperson Hasan Ercakica has touched upon the possibility of coming up with a final decision on the Yesilirmak [occupied Limnities] Gate during this weeks meeting between the two Cyprus leaders. Mr Ercakica is hopeful for receiving good news on both the Yesilirmak Gate and the Territory chapter at the end of the next round between President Mehmet Ali Talat and the Greek Cypriot Leader Demetris Christofias this Friday. At his weekly press briefing, the Presidential Spokesperson Hasan Ercakica referred to the Cyprus visits of high level officials from the European Union and underlined the need for taking up these visits in positive terms. He said, no matter what intention lies behind those visits, they create an opportunity for the Turkish Cypriot Side to reiterate its willingness for a solution to the Cyprus problem. Ercakica also touched upon the Greek Cypriot Sides repeated call on Turkey to recognize it as the government of the so-called Republic of Cyprus and open Turkish ports to the use of Greek Cypriot-registered ships. As a response, he accused the Greek Cypriot Side of trying to block Turkeys path towards the EU membership. The Presidential Spokesperson noted that the Greek Cypriot Side is trying to use Turkeys EU membership process as a tool for imposing a Greek Cypriot-favoured settlement in Cyprus, too. Hasan Ercakica went on to say that there is no possibility for the EU to play an effective role in the solution of the Cyprus problem as a result of the Greek Cypriot Sides unilateral representation within the Bloc. He said South Cyprus plays a role within the EU institutions and therefore, it is impossible for the Bloc to come up with balanced and neutral decisions on Cyprus. Mr Ercakica added that a possible political settlement in Cyprus must pass as valid in accordance with the EUs primary law. [03] Erdogan to visit Brussels to support Turkeys EU bid and AlbaniaTodays Zaman newspaper (25.06.09) publishes the following:Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoan will start a difficult visit to Brussels today, trying to revive a European Union entry bid that is facing new signs of hostility from some member states. Erdogan's second trip this year to EU headquarters comes as membership talks are almost at a standstill, raising doubts over whether Turkey's decades-old dream is attainable. The success of conservative parties opposed to Turkey's membership in this month's European Parliament election, in which EU enlargement fatigue and hostility to Ankara became a campaign issue in some countries, has dealt a blow to its hopes. Reforms long demanded by the EU, such as reforming the military-inspired constitution, have fallen prey to Turkey's chronic political infighting. Further darkening the mood is an alleged plot by the Turkish army to undermine Erdogan's Justice and Development Party (AK Party). If proved authentic, it would confirm critics' fears that the "old Turkey" of generals meddling in politics has not been banished to the past. We are getting very close to a crunch, said Amanda Akcakoca, an analyst at the European Policy Centre in Brussels. Turkey needs to think outside of the box and do something unexpected to impress Europe. Any sign that Turkey is throwing in the towel on its EU campaign, an anchor for political and financial reform in a country prone to instability, would have negative consequences for investors and would unsettle markets. Leaders in France and Germany have revived calls to offer Ankara a "privileged partnership" rather than full membership. Adding to a sense that time is running out, the European Commission, which has frozen eight out of 35 chapters (negotiating areas) over the Cyprus dispute, will in December review Ankara's promise to open its ports to Greek Cypriot vessels. Pro-Turkey Sweden has said it might not be possible to open new chapters during its six-month EU presidency which starts July 1, raising the specter of a standstill in talks. Erdogan, who will be accompanied by Turkey's EU negotiator, Egemen
Bag1, during his visit on Thursday and Friday, told EU ambassadors
this week that he is committed to EU reforms but that he will need more
than words to convince his European audience.
The days when Turkey could say it was committed to reforms aimed at
joining the EU and would win applause in Brussels are becoming fewer
and fewer," said Hugh Pope, analyst for the International Crisis Group
and author of books on Turkey. I don't think we are on a collision
course but in a cyclical low point. Turkey needs to address a
credibility gap.
Turkey has so far opened 10 out of 35 negotiating chapters and hopes to
start a new one this week on taxation.
The EU wants Ankara to reform its constitution, improve free speech,
grant more rights to minorities and curb the power of the army, which
has a long history of intervening in government.
A newspaper report this month that the army had drawn up a plan to stop
the AK Party and an influential religious movement from "destroying
Turkey's secular order and replacing it with an Islamist state" has
sparked a political storm at home.
The General Staff denies all knowledge of the plot, but it has hardened
perceptions that some members of the powerful military still harbor
anti-democratic impulses.
Erdogan told EU ambassadors this week Turkey had entered an
irreversible path towards democracy and rule of law, but the report has
nonetheless raised concerns in Europe.
The OSCE ministers will discuss the future of Europe's security in the
Greek island on June 27 and 28. The NATO-Russia foreign ministers
meeting will take place in the same island on June 27.
Executives from Turkish Foreign Ministry, permanent representation of
Turkey to NATO and OSCE will accompany Davutoglu during his visit to
Corfu.Davutoglu is also expected to meet some of his counterparts,
including the foreign minister of Greece, holding the rotating
presidency of OSCE.
This office will provide the West and Islam the opportunity to work
coherently, said Ekmeleddin 0hsanoglu, the Turkish secretary-general of
the organization, to Today's Zaman. The office will cooperate with the
European Parliament and the European Council to develop the initiatives
for interfaith and intercultural dialogue and institute contacts with
nongovernmental organizations. The office will also be effective in
efforts aimed at preventing discrimination against Muslims and fighting
anti-Islam propaganda. Of course fighting anti-Islam propaganda is one
of the main aims of the office. Intercultural and interfaith dialogue
constitute the priorities of the office in Brussels, 0hsanolu said.
0hsanoglu, who had talks in Washington this week, will meet with the
Belgian minister of foreign affairs in Brussels in the coming days. An
agreement regarding the establishment of the OIC office in Brussels
will be signed at the meeting.
The OIC already has offices in New York and Geneva. The new office in
Brussels will advance relations between Europe and the Muslim world.
With this office, we can create close institutional cooperation with
the member countries of the European Union, 0hsanoglu said.
The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement: A
newspaper published a news report today with reference to the Russian
Ria Novosti and Interfaks news agencies and claimed that the United
States, Turkey and Kyrgyzstan signed a secret agreement about the base
in Manas, Kyrgyzstan, and that President Gul's visit to this country
between May 26-27 was related with the base. This news report is
totally baseless.
The bilateral and regional developments, political, cultural and
economic issues, and existing relations between Turkey and Kyrgyzstan
were high on the agenda of President Gul during the visit. Signing of a
secret agreement among our country, the United States and Kyrgyzstan
about the use of the Manas Base was not brought onto the agenda during
the visit in any way, it added.
While they enjoy friendly political ties, Turkey and the United
Kingdoms partnership has not been equally reflected in economics. Now,
after nearly a decade, a U.K. trade minister visited Ankara on
Wednesday seeking investment opportunities to boost economic
relations.
Turkey is a very good gateway to the Middle East and the U.K. is a good
gateway to Europe," U.K. Minister for Trade, Investment and Business
Mervyn Lord Davies told a small group of journalists at a breakfast. I
think we need to put more efforts to build trade.
The U.K. minister attended a dinner late Tuesday with representatives
of the Turkish private sector. Early in the day, he signed a memorandum
of understanding with Turkey's Industry Minister Zafer
Çaglayan to establish a joint economic and trade committee.
Turkey has to develop companies at the international level, using the
true means of brand names and image on the global stage. This is a
huge country with a braving economy but it's going to need some
national champions that really take those brands and go worldwide,
said Davies. He drew a parallel between the challenges facing Turkey
and the United Kingdom. We have got a very diverse economy in the U.K.
20 years ago we had old-fashioned industries that had to be replaced
urgently. And now we are investing more in the right skills, the right
partnerships, the right type of skilled workers, he said.
I think the one thing we have done well in the U.K., and we have got
the results published last week, is we are still the number one in
terms of foreign direct investment and despite all the problems in the
global economy we were up 11 percent last year. I think what we have
done well to attract foreign investment in the U.K. and I think that
foreign investment came because we are a very open market.
Subtitle: So far so good.
The economic crisis that has shocked the global system was so
extraordinary that it took a few months to realize its impacts,
according to business circles. Economy chiefs look to the matter from
the pessimistic end of the spectrum, raising serious concerns over the
implications of the global crisis, but they also believe crises could
be turned into a window of opportunity. According to many, the crisis
tested Turkish economy, which passed through an economic slump in 2001,
handled the current wave of global fluctuations well compared to most
Western markets.
The Turkish economy is so far so good, said a business figure who
attended the meeting with the U.K. minister. "After the initial impacts
of the crisis, the Turkish economy has started to grow despite the fact
that it is not a huge growth period.
Moreover, Ankara Anatolia news agency (24.06.09) reported the following
from London:
A member of the British House of Commons and a deputy of the
Conservative Party Liam Fox said Wednesday there is no other country
more important for Britain's national security than Turkey.
Speaking at a meeting co-hosted by the Conservative Party Friends of
Turkey group, Fox said that Turkey carries high importance based on its
geopolitical status, existence in NATO and its role in energy
security.
However, anti-Turkish sentiments and xenophobia in the European Union
(EU) all risk Turkey's status, Fox said.
Warning those against Turkish membership in the EU, Fox said that, if
Turkey does not become an EU member, Turkey may turn its face towards
Russia and the Middle East.
Turkey is both politically and militarily important for Britain as a
partner. Turkey has an important place in the Islamic world, Fox also
said.
The reference made to Turkey in an EU document is not reflective of our
partnership understanding, says a Foreign Ministry spokesman. 'We want
to share the illegal immigration burden on our country with our
European partners. This would be the right approach,' he argues.
Turkey said Wednesday that a European Union document referring to
Turkey and illegal immigration was not reflective of the partnership
understanding between the EU and Turkey.
We are not a third party but a negotiating country. Our expectation
from the EU is burden sharing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Burak
Ozurgergin told reporters at a weekly press conference.
Greek efforts to secure support from the EU for its fight to curb
illegal immigration was met with success after EU leaders agreed at a
summit on June 18-19 that agreements must be honored. Following the
summit, the released final declaration made a reference to Turkey.
The reference made to Turkey [in the document] is not reflective of
this partnership understanding, Ozurgergin said. We want to share the
illegal immigration burden on our country with our European partners.
This would be the right approach, he added.
This issue could appear on a meeting agenda between Turkeys Foreign
Minister Ahmet Davutoglu and his Greek counterpart, Dora Bakoyannis, in
the Greek island of Corfu over the weekend. Davutoglu will participate
in the informal meeting of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe.When asked if the Turkish foreign minister would
meet with his Armenian counterpart, Edward Nalbandian, in Corfu, the
spokesman did not rule out a contact but said the ministry was working
on a program and only the meeting with Bakoyannis was clarified.
Subtitle: Various levels to normalize bilateral relations
Upon questions on Turkish-Armenian ties, Ozurgergin said negotiations
were ongoing at various levels to normalize bilateral relations.
Negotiations [with Yerevan] are continuing on the basis of principles
set by Mr. Prime Minister, he added. When asked when the roadmap with
Yerevan would be made public, the spokesman said it would be disclosed
when the circumstances were ripe.
When commenting on Turkeys EU process, Ozurgergin said the negotiations
were expected to begin on the taxation chapter at an intergovernmental
conference later this month. When asked about Ankaras expectations for
the incoming Swedish presidency beginning in July, he said, If a
chapter is technically ready to open, that chapter needs to be opened.
He said Turkey failed to close the chapters due to the blockade, but
that has nothing to do with the process. But will we ever stop? No, we
wont stop. The best answer to this situation would be to continue the
reforms at home. Thats what we are doing, he added.
Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan will make a visit to Brussels on
Thursday. He is trying to revive the EU entry bid that is facing new
signs of hostility from some member states, including France. Erdogans
visit is the second trip he has made to the EU headquarters this year.
On the topic of post-election protests in neighboring Iran, Ozurgergin
said it is believed that Iran has the capability to find a solution to
the debates by keeping open its paths to seek rights. He said that Iran
is a very important country for Turkey, and said the country is also
important for regional stability. He said Turkey hoped Iran would
conclude the unfolding political debates in a short period of time and
that every decision made would be met with respect by Turkey.
During the dinner, Mr Turk explained to the ambassadors the view of his
party regarding the point reached for a solution to the Kurdish problem
and asked for their contribution so that the ceasefire decision of the
PKK is taken seriously.
(KV)
In a lunch meeting with the ambassadors of EU countries on Monday,
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan reiterated his government's
commitment to the goal of joining the European Union.
He stressed once more that Turkey will not accept anything short of
full membership. Any other offers will further derail Turkey's EU
membership process and Turkey will look for other ways. This was the
gist of Erdogan's message on Monday.
Erdogan not only rejected the privileged partnership offers of France
and Germany, but also expressed his concerns over making Turkey a
domestic political issue in Europe. The parliamentary elections in
Europe resulted in big wins for the conservatives, most of whom oppose
Turkey's EU membership. Unlike any other candidate country, Turkey was
once more part of the election campaign debates. At a time of deepening
uncertainties, job losses and economic crisis, some European voters may
like the idea of excluding Turkey to secure Europe's future. But is
this really in Europe's long-term interest?
In an excellent piece on June 19, Hugh Pope, a long-term observer of
Turkish affairs and project director at the 0stanbul branch of the
International Crisis Group, asked a very simple question: What does
privileged partnership mean exactly? German Foreign Minister
Frank-Walter Steinmeier admitted to journalists last week that he does
not know what privileged partnership means. Pope's search has yielded
that those who advocate privileged partnership for Turkey have failed
to explain its precise nature, scope and mechanism. The only document,
Pope notes, is by Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, the current German
minister of economics and technology. Zu Guttenberg's outline, which is
the most detailed available, offers nothing more than an observer
status to Turkey on key economic, political and security issues.
But Turkey is already a full member of many European initiatives and
institutions. Turkey is a founding member of the Council of Europe and
a long-term member of NATO. Turkey already signed the customs union
agreements over 10 years ago. Privileged partnership brings no new
incentives to Turkey and does not make Turkey-EU relations any better.
Why would Turkey or any other country agree to such conditions?
There is a delicate balance between the technical and political sides
of the EU process for Turkey. On the technical side, there is a lot of
work to be done. Implementing the EU acquis -- chapters during the
negotiation period -- is key to opening and closing new chapters, and
this requires a lot of technical work on everything from trade and
fishing to competition laws. There is a lot that needs to be done here
and the Turkish side must move speedily with their European
counterparts. We hope the Swedish presidency will witness the opening
and closing of two more chapters over the next six months.
But the real problem, as everybody knows, is political. As Prime
Minister Erdogan said in his speech on Monday, some chapters have been
blocked for purely political reasons. The Cyprus issue is the number
one political issue. But there are others including the Armenian
genocide claims and the opening of the Halki seminary. None of these
issues are impossible to overcome. Turkey has shown its resolve to
address the most difficult and sensitive issues in Turkey including the
Kurdish and Alevi issues, the rights of religious minorities and
constitutional reforms. The problem is that the steps taken in this
direction have not helped the EU process in any significant way.
Those who argue that the government has lost its desire for the EU
should remember what happened in Turkey in 2007 and 2008. The
ideological opposition to the Justice and Development Party (AK Party)
government led to a crisis over the presidential elections, then early
elections, then the closure case against the AK Party, then increased
outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) attacks and then the economic
crisis. All of these cost Turkey two precious years not only for the EU
process but also for Turkey's democratization process.
There is no reason why the government should not move ahead with a
renewed sense of excitement and zeal for the membership process. The
question is whether the Europeans have the same desire and will.
a) Taraf report on a Military Action Plan
In an article in Milliyet, Fikret Bila summarizes the lessons the
military, the politicians and the media can learn from the ongoing
discussions regarding the alleged military action plan drawn against
the Justice and Development Party, AKP, and the Gulen group. One lesson
to be learned is that the relations between the military and the
government are still fragile in the country, Bila maintains, adding
that another lesson is that every sector is united around the issue of
democracy.
Viewing the contradictory statements made by Prime Minister Erdogan
regarding the alleged military action plan in his column in Vatan,
Gungor Mengi questions why Erdogan, addressing some ambassadors of the
27 EU member countries, claimed that the "coup document" did not affect
Turkey and that all its institutions are united around the concept of
democracy. Recalling that the prime minister raised hell and asked that
a criminal complaint be filed upon the emergence of such a document,
Mengi is skeptical about the harmony Erdogan wants to paint in the
higher echelons of the state. If the original of the document cannot be
found this means that a document was forged in a bid to attack the
Turkish Armed Forces, TSK, claims Mengi, concluding that there should
be a deterrent price to be paid for slandering the TSK.
Commenting on the ongoing discussions on the alleged military action
plan in an article in Cumhuriyet, Cuneyt Arcayurek questions why no one
thought of investigating whether this document is the result of a
"forgery operation" expertly prepared by certain individuals. Recalling
the document that surfaced in the aftermath of the 27 May 1960 military
intervention signed by Colonel Dickson and the announcement made at the
time that such forged document operations are from time to time
launched by the secret services of the Soviet Union and the United
States to create disturbances in certain countries, Arcayurek wonders
whether a plot is being hatched against Turkey through such a coup
document.
b) Turkish stance on the developments in Iran
Speculating on how the developments in Iran will affect regional and
world policies in an article in Milliyet, Sami Kohen believes that this
all depends on who will be ruling Iran in the future. Recalling that
the first steps of the Iranian nuclear program were taken during
Musavi's premiership in the 80ies, Kohen adds that, however, his
election platform indicated that he would adopt a more pragmatic
approach in its relations with the West. Viewing the possibility of
reelection as very small, Kohen goes on to speculate on the foreign
policy to be pursued by Ahmadinezhad and US President Obama's stand in
the event further blood is shed in Iran. Doubting that the US
administration will want to hold talks and reach conciliation with the
Ahmadinezhad government in the event of more violence and the detention
of the opposition members, Kohen asserts that the events in Iran are
further distancing the country from the West. Kohen then refers to
Ankara's claim that the developments in Iran are that country's
internal affairs and criticizes the Turkish government for its silence
in the face of the developments in that country, maintaining that
Ankara should announce its views and concerns regarding the
developments in a neighbouring country.
To fully comprehend the developments in Iran one has to know who Musavi
is, writes Yasemin Congar in an article in Taraf. Describing Musavi's
journey from a radical revolutionary to a moderate reformist who wishes
to render the regime democratic without diluting its "Islamic" nature,
Congar maintains that had Musavi's efforts to normalize Iran's
relations with the world and to increase freedoms not been left
unreciprocated because of the inapt policies of the West, then maybe
the change the Iranian people are demanding now would have been
realized years ago. Citing the promises made by Musavi for a wise
economic policy, the dissolution of the morality police, the abolition
of laws that limit the role of women in society, the privatization of
the television channels, the normalization of relations with the United
States, and the country's advancement on the path to becoming a
"peaceful" nuclear power, Congar asserts that neither Musavi nor the
protesters want to put an end to the Islamic regime.
c) Cyprus Issue
In an article in Cumhuriyet, Orhan Birgit refers to the recent visit of
European Commission Vice President Gunter Verheugen to Cyprus and to
his remarks that Turkey is fomenting a non-solution in Cyprus and that
there is no longer any need for Turkish guarantees. This proposal,
which aims at severing Turkey's ties with Cyprus that is becoming a
source of oil, is based on a plan to force the Turkish troops to
withdraw from the island and to disrupt the balance of powers in favor
of Greece, claims Birgit, drawing attention to the silence maintained
by the Ankara administration on the issue.
Commenting on Erdogan's address to some ambassadors of the 27 EU member
countries, Birgit writes: "He did not even mention the EU proposal on
the solution of the Cyprus problem that takes into consideration only
the interests of the Greek Cypriot side and, therefore, those of
Greece. Was he trying to say that he has digested those proposals?"
Expressing his fear over the silence of the government officials on the
issue, Birgit concludes: "The government seems pleased about presenting
to the public in a planned manner the civilian authority-soldier
dilemma because in this manner we are becoming a community unaware of
and therefore insensitive toward the economic crisis and the ongoing
major foreign policy issues such as the Cyprus, Kirkuk, and Azerbaijani
problems."
YH
|