Compact version |
|
Monday, 18 November 2024 | ||
|
RFE/RL Newsline, Vol. 3, No. 2, 00-01-04Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty: Newsline Directory - Previous Article - Next ArticleFrom: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty <http://www.rferl.org>RFE/RL NEWSLINEVol. 3, No. 2, 4 January 2000CONTENTS[A] TRANSCAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA
[B] SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
[C] END NOTE
[A] TRANSCAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIA[01] FELLOW PRESIDENTS COMMENT ON YELTSIN'S RESIGNATION...Azerbaijani President Heidar Aliev has suggested that formerRussian President Yeltsin stepped down "because he was unable to work any more," according to Turan on 3 January. Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze on 31 December praised Yeltsin's move as courageous, adding that he "made a unique contribution to democratic reforms in Russia," according to Caucasus Press. A spokesman for Kyrgyzstan's President Askar Akaev told RFE/RL's Bishkek bureau on 31 December that Yeltsin's move was "the right one," and will strengthen democratic institutions in Russia. Tajikistan's Imomali Rakhmonov said Yeltsin made "a resolute and wise move, opening the way to the young," according to ITAR-TASS on 4 January. Uzbekistan's Foreign Minister Abdulaziz Kamilov termed Yeltsin's resignation the only correct decision in the circumstances, ITAR-TASS reported on 3 January. LF [02] ...AND PUTIN'S ELEVATION TO PRESIDENCYActing PresidentPutin held telephone conversations on 3 January with Aliev, Rakhmonov, and Uzbek President Islam Karimov, according to ITAR-TASS. Neither Aliev nor Shevardnadze publicly commented on Putin's elevation to the post of acting president, but both expressed the hope that bilateral relations with Russia will now improve. Akaev and Rakhmonov both sent messages of congratulation to Putin. Rakhmonov also expressed confidence that cooperation between Tajikistan and Russia will continue, according to ITAR-TASS. Karimov on 3 January said he believes the expectation of many people both in Russia and abroad that Putin will restore Russia to its former superpower status are entirely justified. LF [03] AZERBAIJAN'S OPPOSITION DEMANDS NEW MUNICIPAL ELECTIONSNineAzerbaijani opposition parties, including Musavat and the Azerbaijan National Independence Party but not the Azerbaijan Popular Front, have issued a joint statement calling for new municipal elections, Turan reported on 3 January. The statement notes that the 12 December 1999 elections should have taken place two years earlier according to the constitution. It added that opposition proposals were ignored during the process of drafting the electoral legislation. The statement further called for criminal proceedings to be brought against officials and members of electoral commissions who either committed procedural violations or turned a blind eye to them during the election campaign. LF [04] KAZAKHSTAN ALLOCATES SPECIAL PREMIUMS TO NEW YEAR BABIESThefirst 2,000 infants born in Kazakhstan in 2000 will receive allowances of 100,000 tenge ($700) apiece from the country's Demographic Fund, RFE/RL's Almaty bureau reported on 4 January. The allowances are part of a program to boost the birthrate and reverse the decline in the country's population, which has fallen from 17 million to 14.9 million since 1991. But the effectiveness of such incentives may be undercut by the government's decision to reform the medical system by shifting the onus of funding medical facilities from the central government to the regional administrations as of 1 January. LF [05] ANOTHER KYRGYZ OPPOSITION PARTY FACES ELECTION RESTRICTIONSA Bishkek district court on 3 January rejected an appeal bythe opposition Ar-Namys (Conscience) Party against a ruling by the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) that the party does not qualify to nominate candidates for the party-list seats in the 20 February election to the lower chamber of Kyrgyzstan's new parliament, RFE/RL's Bishkek bureau reported. The Justice Ministry had advised the CEC not to register the party, arguing that the electoral code requires parties to be registered at least one year in advance of an election date in order to participate. Ar-Namys was registered in August. But a spokesman for Ar-Namys argued that the electoral code was based on the 1991 Law on Public Associations, and that the Law on Political Parties adopted in 1999 does not impose any comparable restrictions on election participation. LF [06] TAJIK OPPOSITION PARTIES HOLD PRE-ELECTION CONGRESSESAddressing a congress of the Islamic Renaissance Party (IRP)on 31 December, party chairman Said Abdullo Nuri affirmed the party's commitment to building a fair and democratic society and observing the constraints of Tajikistan's Constitution in its efforts to create an Islamic state, Asia Plus-Blitz reported on 3 January. In an allusion to the November 1999 presidential elections, Nuri noted that his party had acquired experience in election campaigning despite "artificial obstacles created by some bureaucrats." He said the IRP is the sole realistic opponent to the ruling People's Democratic Party of Tajikistan. Delegates to the congress approved a list of 22 candidates who will contend the 63 seats in the new lower house of parliament to be elected on 27 February. In other news, the Communist Party of Tajikistan named 22 candidates for the poll at a 27 December congress, according to Asia Plus-Blitz. In all, six parties will compete. LF [B] SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE[07] CROATIAN OPPOSITION SWEEPS TO VICTORYPreliminary unofficialresults of the 3 January parliamentary elections show that the coalition of Social Democrats (SDP) and Social Liberals (HSLS) will likely take 71 seats in the approximately 150- seat lower house (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 3 January 2000). Their allies in a coalition of four smaller parties appear to have won 24 seats. The governing Croatian Democratic Community (HDZ) will have 40 seats. Reports suggest that the HDZ is leading in only one of the 10 electoral districts. Under the system of proportional representation, four seats will go to tiny right-wing parties. The turnout was about 78 percent. The SDP's Ivica Racan, who is expected to be the new prime minister, said: "We shall do our best to justify the voters' confidence," AP reported. HDZ leaders Mate Granic and Ivic Pasalic conceded defeat and promised to provide a robust opposition (see "End Note" below). PM [08] BIG TURNOUT AMONG CROATS ABROADTens of thousands ofCroatian citizens cast their ballots abroad without any serious incidents or problems, RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported on 3 January (see "RFE/RL Newsline," 3 January 2000). Turnouts were large across Bosnia-Herzegovina, except in Banja Luka. "Vecernji list" reported that 120,000 persons in Bosnia took part in the vote. In federal Yugoslavia, large numbers of people cast their ballots in Belgrade and Kotor in particular. The polling place in Ljubljana ran out of ballot papers because an unexpectedly large number of Croats vacationing in Slovenia turned up to vote. PM [09] BOSNIAN BORDER POLICE WAITING FOR DUTYSome 30 Bosnianborder police completed their training course in Austria on 3 January, RFE/RL's South Slavic Service reported. They include 10 Muslims, 10 Serbs, and 10 Croats. They cannot take up their duties patrolling the frontier until the joint parliament approves their mandate. Bosnian Serb politicians in particular are reluctant to allow persons who are not from their own ethnic group to take up border duty in the Republika Srpska. Most Bosnian Serbs interpret the Dayton peace agreement primarily as an affirmation of the sovereignty of the Republika Srpska rather than as the re- establishment of a unified Bosnia. PM [10] GENERAL JACKSON REJECTS CRITICISM OF BRITISH FORCESGeneralSir Mike Jackson, who commanded NATO forces during their entry into Kosova in June, denied charges in a reported British government study that British forces in Kosova suffered from poor command and control structures and were badly equipped. Jackson told the BBC on 4 January that the report, excerpts of which the BBC broadcast the previous day, described a situation that was "difficult to recognize from my experience." He stressed that British forces would have been able to launch a successful ground assault on Serbian forces had they been ordered to do so. The report suggested that British troops had to borrow equipment from other NATO forces because their own was unreliable, and that their communications were so insecure that Serbian monitors "could hear every word." AP reported from London that the study was designed to be as critical as possible as part of a standard review process following any British military operation. PM [11] REINHARDT PRAISES BELGIAN KFORGeneral Max Reinhardt, whosucceeded Jackson as KFOR commander, on 3 January visited the 1,000-strong Belgian contingent that patrols Kosova's northern frontier with Serbia. He told the Belgians they "have one of the most challenging and busy boundary control operations. I am very pleased with the professionalism and proficiency in which they carry out their duties," AP reported. Critics have charged that Serbian paramilitaries and other forces continue to pass between Serbia and Kosova, which Serbian forces were supposed to have left in June under an agreement with NATO. PM [12] ALBANIAN EMIGRATION BALANCEThe Ministry of EconomicCooperation and Trade said in a report issued in Tirana on 3 January that more than 15 percent of Albania's 3.2 million people have left the impoverished country during the past 10 years, dpa reported. About 400,000 Albanian emigrants are currently in Greece, while 150,000 others are in Italy. About 50,000 have gone to Germany, the U.S., Canada, Switzerland, France, England, Turkey, or Belgium. Much of the emigration has been legal, but large numbers of illegal migrants have gone to Italy and Greece. The often difficult living and working conditions of the Albanians in Greece have been an occasional source of tension between the two countries. Many Greeks blame Albanians for crime-related problems. PM [13] ROMANIAN PRESIDENT SAYS ANTI-SEMITISM 'ISOLATED ANDMARGINALIZED'Speaking at the Yad-Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem, President Emil Constantinescu said he wishes Romania were in the position to claim that it defended "all its Jews" during the Holocaust. Unfortunately, he said, this is not so. Only some of them were protected, while others had to suffer "persecutions and humiliations" and others yet were "deported and...fell victim to pogroms" under the "Ion Antonescu dictatorship." Constantinescu said he wanted to once more express his "profound regret" for those times, as he did back in 1997. But he denied that anti-Semitism plays any role in his country today. He said Romania's authorities and civil society "categorically reject" it and that "anti-Semitic voices" are a "very isolated" phenomenon, present "particularly in the media." The authorities, he said, "are investigating" those responsible for publishing such articles. MS [14] RUSSIA SAYS YELTSIN'S DEPARTURE WILL NOT INFLUENCETRANSDNIESTER CONFLICT RESOLUTIONThe Russian Foreign Ministry says the resignation of President Yeltsin will have no influence on the position of Moscow toward the Transdniester conflict, Flux reported on 3 January. The ministry sent a statement to the separatist authorities in the Transdniester explaining that Russia will continue to be a mediator in the conflict and a "guarantor" of the implementation of the understandings that have been reached so far. The ministry reiterated Moscow's position that the withdrawal of Russian forces from the Transdniester must be "co-ordinated" with the acceptance of a common understanding on the special status of the Transdniester. MS [C] END NOTE[15] Croatian Opposition Confronts Challenge Of GoverningBy Patrick MooreThe two Croatian opposition coalitions appear headed for a landslide win over the Croatian Democratic Community (HDZ), which has held power for nearly 10 years. Once in office, the coalitions will have their work cut out for them. The 3 January parliamentary elections were remarkable for at least two reasons (see "RFE/RL Newsline" above). First, they mark the end of the HDZ's long grip on power through most of Croatia. During the past decade, opposition parties won control of Istria and several cities, but the HDZ's control of the central government was complete. For the first time since gaining independence in 1991, Croats will now experience a peaceful transition of authority to the opposition (see "RFE/RL Balkan Report," 16 November 1999). Second, as some pre-election polls anticipated, the winners' margin of victory was a large one. Voters clearly wanted a change and failed to be swayed by the HDZ's appeals for a sympathy vote in honor of the late President Franjo Tudjman, who died in December. Preliminary returns suggest that the two coalitions will have approximately 95 out of about 150 seats in the lower house. The largest coalition, which consists of the Social Democrats (SDP) and the Croatian Social Liberal Party (HSLS), seems likely to take 71 seats. The SDP's Ivica Racan is set to head the new government, while the HSLS's Drazen Budisa will be his coalition's candidate in the 24 January presidential vote to replace Tudjman. The smaller coalition of four centrist parties will likely win 24 legislative seats. The HDZ's share has fallen from 75 in the 1995 elections to a more modest 40 this time. The margin of victory could prove a poisoned chalice for the coalitions, however, because the voters will expect a government with such a strong mandate to deliver on its pre-election promises. These involve social and economic progress, democratization, and putting an end to international isolation. The key issue for most voters was the need to improve the standard of living in a country with an unemployment rate of more than 20 percent and a monthly per capita income of about $400. Tudjman's election slogan earlier in the decade was "from victory to prosperity," but it has proven empty for most Croats, including many veterans of the war for independence. Once the war ended in 1995 and people's attention turned increasingly to economic concerns, the SDP began a steady rise from the margins of political life to become the largest opposition party. Its platform centers on bread-and-butter issues and shuns nationalist rhetoric; the SDP is the only major party that does not include the word "Croatian" in its name. The second area in which voters will have great expectations of the new government will be in democratization. As was the case in post-Meciar Slovakia, the new Croatian government has pledged to investigate the many dubious privatizations carried out by its predecessor. A major source of resentment against the HDZ was the popular perception that party insiders grew ever richer at a time when most Croats had difficulty making ends meet. The coalitions have pledged to clean out these Augean stables. The new government has also promised to end political manipulation of the media--particularly of state- run television--and of the intelligence services. Tudjman's imperial presidency, moreover, will be reduced in scale, and many of his powers transferred to parliament in a move that even the HDZ has pledged to support. The victorious coalitions will also likely examine the constitutional provisions that give full citizenship to ethnic Croats in Bosnia-Herzegovina, who are also citizens of that republic. The central issue is the provision granting the Herzegovinians--who include many hard-line nationalists-- the right to vote in Croatian elections. By curbing or eliminating that right, the new government would deny the HDZ a large block of electors. The government would also gain favor with the international community, which regards the HDZ as bent on realizing Tudjman's dream of a greater Croatia at Bosnia's expense. It was no accident that one of the first reactions to the coalitions' victory came from prominent Bosnian Muslim politician Mirza Hajic, who said: "That is good news for Bosnia and Herzegovina." This leads to the third area in which the new government will seek to make good on its promises, namely the need to end Croatia's international isolation on account of the HDZ's policies on democratization and on Bosnia. Nowhere was the isolation more painfully evident than at Tudjman's funeral, at which only Turkey was represented by its head of state; most Western countries sent only their ambassadors. When Slovenia and Croatia became independent in 1991, they were at the same place on the road to Euro-Atlantic integration. Now Slovenia is at the forefront of most post- communist countries in this respect, but Croatia has slid behind even Albania and Macedonia. Those two Balkan countries are in NATO's Partnership for Peace Program, which Croatia has not been invited to join. But to the extent that the coalitions institute democratic reforms at home and cut ties to the Herzegovinian nationalists, they are likely to find a quick and warm response from Washington and the EU. Encouraging words have already come from those quarters. And the large diaspora can serve as a bridge between Croatia and its Western allies. Additional pitfalls nonetheless remain. The coalitions will need to remain united and not fall prey to squabbling among themselves, as has happened in post-Meciar Slovakia. This will be all the more important if the HDZ's moderate and popular Mate Granic defeats Budisa for the presidency, and if the fractious HDZ itself remains united. The new government will also need to define a position on allowing ethnic Serbian refugees to return that will please both the international community and the voters. Precious little of this will be easy. 04-01-00 Reprinted with permission of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
|