|
|
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL STRATEGY REPORT MARCH 1996:
FINANCIAL CRIMES AND MONEY LAUNDERING
United States Department of State
Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
INCSR 1996 COUNTRY CHAPTERS
Finland to Guyana
Finland. (Low) A major development in Finland in 1994 was the
criminalization of money laundering, thereby making this an illegal and
punishable act. Significant strides towards effective use of this
legislation as a basis for prosecutions were made in 1995. Finnish
officials believe that little money laundering takes place in Finland.
France. (Medium) France's asset seizure law is considered one of the
strongest in western europe. Money laundering legislation pending in
the national assembly will strengthen criminal penalities for money
laundering and further expand authority to seize, secure and share
assets. Undercover work by police and customs officers is permitted in
money laundering cases but is used very selectively. Some american law
enforcement techniques, such as "sting" operations, are legal, but have
not been widely accepted or employed.
A finance ministry office (TRACFIN) conducts initial investigations of
suspicious bank activities; it refers money laundering cases to a
magistrate for subsequent referral to the police or customs for more
extensive investigations. Before cases are referred to a magistrate,
however, TRACFIN must establish at least a possible connection to drug
activity.
Some money laundering takes place in the French Caribbean, and drug
proceeds may enter the French banking system through Caribbean branches.
St. Martin, in particular, is considered a site for money laundering.
French West Indies. (Low) Martinique, Guadeloupe and French Guiana are
departments of France, subject to French law. Money launderers are
active in the islands, especially on the French side of St. Martin and
on St. Barthelemy, which are part of the Guadeloupe department. The
free port status, offshore banking, heavy flow of tourists and easy
access to the less-controlled Dutch half of St. Martin make that island
the most susceptible to money laundering. The expectation is that
additional money laundering legislation, including strengthened criminal
penalties and authority to seize and share assets, will be enacted in
early 1996. Drug proceeds enter the French banking system through
branches in the Caribbean.
Georgia. (No Priority) While there is no anti-money laundering
legislation in place, the small scale of the economy and lack of an
effective electronic bank transfer and clearing system makes it unlikely
that Georgia will become significant in this area.
Germany. (High) Money laundering in Germany involves narcotics proceeds
as well as proceeds from other illegal activities. Two significant
cooperation cases between DEA and BKA have highlighted the increased use
of Germany as a money laundering center by international drug
trafficking organizations. Money laundering occurs in both the banking
system and the non-bank financial system, and money laundering proceeds
are controlled by both local and international organizations. According
to press accounts, money laundering has increased to approximately DM 80
billion (US$57 billion) annually. Banks appear to the main medium of
exchange; lawyers and tax accountants are also involved.
German authorities have taken several initiatives to curb this activity,
including new legislation, while also seeking cooperation from other
governments. There are reports of German financial institutions being
used for currency transactions involving international narcotics
trafficking proceeds that include significant amounts of United States
currency, and currency derived from illegal drug sales in the United
States. Germany has cooperated with law enforcement agencies of the USG
and other governments investigating financial crimes related to
narcotics; for example, FRG and US authorities have identified
suspicious accounts and cooperated in obtaining further background
information on the account holders.
Money laundering is a criminal offense (both drug-related and other
criminally-related money laundering). Banks and other financial
institutions are required to know, record, and report the identity of
customers engaging in significant, large currency transactions. They
are required to maintain necessary records to reconstruct significant
transactions through financial institutions in order to respond quickly
to information requests from appropriate government authorities in
narcotics-related cases. Germany requires that financial institutions
report transactions of more than dm 20,000 (approx US$ 14,300) to state
central authorities. The banking community cooperates with enforcement
efforts. Bankers are protected by law with respect to cooperation with
law enforcement entities. There are no controls on the amount of
currency which can be brought into or out of Germany. Money laundering
controls are not applied to some non-banking financial institutions,
such as exchange houses. The controls, however, are applied to other
financial institutions, such as insurance companies.
The government has the authority to forfeit seized assets and the law
allows for civil and criminal forfeiture. But other than normal
inventory procedures, Germany has not established separate systems for
identifying, tracing, freezing, seizing, and forfeiting narcotics-
related assets; nor has it enacted laws for sharing seized narcotics
assets with other governments; nor is new legislation being considered.
The obstacles to passing such laws are political. Weakness in reporting
requirements may allow traffickers to shield assets.
The drug-related asset seizure and forfeiture laws that exist are
enforced by the government. Numerous government entities are
responsible for enforcement including state prosecuting attorneys, the
BKA, and the customs department. The police have adequate resources to
seize assets. The exact value of all assets, seized by all entities in
all states, is unknown. German authorities cooperate with US efforts to
trace or seize assets and the government makes use of tips from other
country enforcement officials regarding the flow of drug-derived assets.
National laws do not permit sharing of forfeited assets with other
countries.
Ghana. (Low) Ghana reportedly experiences some money laundering,
believed to be proceeds of sales of cocaine and heroin. Money
laundering a criminal offense, not limited to drug trafficking proceeds.
Banks and financial institutions are required to report large currency
transactions of customers who come under investigation by law
enforcement authorities. Banks are required to maintain records to
reconstruct significant transactions to respond quickly to requests from
appropriate government authorities in narcotics- related cases, but are
not required to report suspicious transactions. Data is reported only
upon request by a central authority. Bankers are protected by law if
requested to cooperate with law enforcement entities. There are
controls on currency amounts brought into and out of the country. Ghana
has established systems to identify, trace, freeze, seize or forfeit
narcotics-related assets. In October 1994, GOG and its UNDCP sub-
regional neighbors put into place a multilateral agreement to harmonize
efforts regarding asset tracing and seizure.
Gibraltar. (Medium) After months of intense pressure from the UK,
Gibraltar passed the Criminal Justice Ordinance which is intended to
ensure that its offshore banks conform to the European Union's money
laundering directive. Gibraltar disputes Spain's contentions about the
volume of money laundering on the Rock, and the head of Gibraltar's
Financial Services Commission contends that the new law will have little
affect because the banks have always been well supervised and regulated.
In mid-December, a money laundering squad was established as the central
authority for receiving suspicious transactions information, and is led
by a London-based Metropolitan police officer.
Greece. (Medium) In August the Greek parliament approved a law
supplementing existing legislation which outlawed all forms of money
laundering. The law creates various enforcement mechanisms and proof of
identity requirements, and permits controlled delivery of narcotics for
enforcement purposes. Greece is not currently considered a major
financial or money laundering center. However, Greece remains
vulnerable to money laundering because purchasers of government debt
issues receive tax free income, and, if paid for in cash, are not
subject to identity requirements; the sale of Greek treasury obligations
now amounts to about usd 22.5 billion annually, or one quarter of
Greece's GNP. In addition, seven new casinos (convenient vehicles for
money laundering) were licensed in Greece in 1995.
Guatemala. (Medium) The potential for money laundering in Guatemala is
very high because of the lack of either effective monitoring and control
of financial transactions, or of laws specifically designed to combat
money laundering. The amount of drug money being laundered through
Guatemala is difficult to determine given the lack of controls, however
current investigations indicate that money laundering is increasing.
Financial institutions in Guatemala are highly vulnerable to the illicit
introduction and movement of currency among Guatemala, the United
States, and off-shore banks. During the last year, the GOG has made
little progress on criminalizing money laundering or investigating
financial cases.
Guyana. (No Priority) Guyana has no laws governing money laundering nor
is there evidence any significant volume of money laundering occurs.
The Attorney General has said that a new financial institutions act will
include anti-money laundering legislation.
|